Diversity of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> PCR ribotypes isolated from freshwater sediments depends on the isolation method

<i>Clostridioides difficile</i> is an intestinal pathogen of humans and animals. In community-associated infections, the environment is suggested to play a significant role in overall transmission routes. Although the prevalence of <i>C. difficile</i> in freshwater and soil has been widely studied, little is known about its presence in sediments. In this study, we tested 15 sediment samples collected from various freshwater sources. <i>C. difficile</i> was isolated from all sampled sites, yielding a total of 171 strains grouped into 26 ribotypes, with 001/072 and 014/020 being the most prevalent. Genome sequencing of 37 isolates from 17 PCR ribotypes confirmed the presence of highly related strains in the geographically distant and unlinked water samples. Eight divergent PCR ribotypes from clades C-II and C-III were found in six samples. In each sample, the unbound fraction (supernatant after sediment wash) and bound fraction (sonicated sediment sample) were subjected to enrichment. Sonication was only slightly better than washing in terms of sample positivity (14 positive samples with sonication and 11 with washing). However, sonication substantially increased the diversity of the PCR ribotypes obtained (23 in sonicated samples vs nine in washed samples). In conclusion, sediments are a rich source for investigating the diversity of environmental <i>C. difficile,</i> including isolates from divergent lineages. Selection of the isolation method can significantly impact the diversity of captured PCR ribotypes.IMPORTANCE<i>Clostridioides difficile</i>, a pathogenic bacterium that can cause intestinal infections in humans and animals, thrives in the gut but also disperses widely through spores found in the environment. Clinical and environmental strains often overlap with common PCR ribotypes, which are consistently isolated worldwide. Environmental studies have mostly focused on water and soil, but sediments have been very poorly studied. In this study, we investigated the presence of <i>C. difficile</i> in various freshwater sediments and evaluated the effectiveness of two different isolation approaches on positivity rates and strain diversity. <i>C. difficile</i> was found to be highly prevalent in sediments, with an isolation rate of 100%. Sonication proved to be more effective than simple washing for capturing a greater diversity of PCR ribotypes. Overall, this study underscores the widespread presence of <i>C. difficile</i> in freshwater sediments and emphasizes the importance of continued surveillance and monitoring to understand its ecology and transmission dynamics.