A correlation analysis between passively assessed gait initiation signal data and brain tumours progress

• Gait initiation signal data as resource to differentiate healthy individuals and brain tumours patients. • Correlation between gait evolution and progress of brain tumours. • Discussion regarding the use of gait data for brain tumour location. • Influence of biological sex and age on gait analysis in the oncology context. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used to diagnosing and monitoring the progress of brain tumours. However, it is costly, not easily accessible, and requires frequent visits to specialised health centres. Method: This study explores the use of passively assessed gait initiation signal data (GISD) as a potential alternative to MRI. We evaluated three hypotheses: (1) Certain features extracted from GISD are more sensitive in identifying brain tumours; (2) Changes in GISD patterns are correlated with brain tumour progression; and (3) The locations of brain tumours are correlated with GISD features. Data from healthy individuals in the UK Biobank (N=240 x 7 days) were used to establish a baseline for signal analysis. Then, we assessed the sensitivity of 28 features extracted from GISD to differentiate this healthy population and brain tumours patients (BrainWear project, N=49 x 9 months). Results: Statistical tests revealed significant differences (p < 0.05) in subsets of GISD-extracted features between healthy individuals and cancer patients. Classification models achieved a maximum accuracy of 77 % in distinguishing between these two groups. However, the identification of tumour location was less accurate (33 % − 65 %), particularly for certain regions (e.g., right temporal). We also found evidence of correlation between GISD patterns and tumours progression and treatments. Conclusions: Passive GISD analysis shows promise as a complementary tool to MRI in diagnosing brain tumours. However, our small patient cohort and limited evaluation period highlight the need for larger studies to generalise these findings and derive more reliable clinical implications .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2024.106858
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A correlation analysis between passively assessed gait initiation signal data and brain tumours progress

Katarzyna Wac, Clauirton Siebra
1 citations
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
0.35
article

A correlation analysis between passively assessed gait initiation signal data and brain tumours progress

Katarzyna Wac, Clauirton Siebra
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Gait initiation signal data as resource to differentiate healthy individuals and brain tumours patients. • Correlation between gait evolution and progress of brain tumours. • Discussion regarding the use of gait data for brain tumour location. • Influence of biological sex and age on gait analysis in the oncology context. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used to diagnosing and monitoring the progress of brain tumours. However, it is costly, not easily accessible, and requires frequent visits to specialised health centres. Method: This study explores the use of passively assessed gait initiation signal data (GISD) as a potential alternative to MRI. We evaluated three hypotheses: (1) Certain features extracted from GISD are more sensitive in identifying brain tumours; (2) Changes in GISD patterns are correlated with brain tumour progression; and (3) The locations of brain tumours are correlated with GISD features. Data from healthy individuals in the UK Biobank (N=240 x 7 days) were used to establish a baseline for signal analysis. Then, we assessed the sensitivity of 28 features extracted from GISD to differentiate this healthy population and brain tumours patients (BrainWear project, N=49 x 9 months). Results: Statistical tests revealed significant differences (p < 0.05) in subsets of GISD-extracted features between healthy individuals and cancer patients. Classification models achieved a maximum accuracy of 77 % in distinguishing between these two groups. However, the identification of tumour location was less accurate (33 % − 65 %), particularly for certain regions (e.g., right temporal). We also found evidence of correlation between GISD patterns and tumours progression and treatments. Conclusions: Passive GISD analysis shows promise as a complementary tool to MRI in diagnosing brain tumours. However, our small patient cohort and limited evaluation period highlight the need for larger studies to generalise these findings and derive more reliable clinical implications .

Biomedical Signal Processing and ControlVol. 99
University of Geneva (CH), Universidade Federal da Paraíba (BR), Imperial College London (GB)
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.