Intersectionality: Affirmative Action with Multidimensional Identities

Studying the design of affirmative action policies when identities are multidimensional, we provide a formal demonstration of the importance of intersectionality. Prevailing affirmative action policies are based only on one identity dimension (e.g., race, gender, socioeconomic class). We find that any such nonintersectional policy can almost never achieve a representative outcome. In fact, nonintersectional policies often increase the underrepresentation of underrepresented groups in a manner undetected by standard measures. Examples based on race and gender reveal significant hidden inequality arising from nonintersectional policies. We show how to construct intersectional policies that achieve proportional representation. This paper was accepted by Dorothea Kübler, behavioral economics and decision analysis. Funding: This work was supported by the Austrian Science Fund [FG 6-G, I 3487] and the Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-19-CE48-0018-01, ANR-19-P3IA-0003, and ANR-23-PEIA-0003].

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Science
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.03839
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intersectionality: Affirmative Action with Multidimensional Identities

Jean‐Paul Carvalho, Bary Pradelski, Cole Williams
3 citations
Management Science
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
2.79
article

Intersectionality: Affirmative Action with Multidimensional Identities

Jean‐Paul Carvalho, Bary Pradelski, Cole Williams
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Studying the design of affirmative action policies when identities are multidimensional, we provide a formal demonstration of the importance of intersectionality. Prevailing affirmative action policies are based only on one identity dimension (e.g., race, gender, socioeconomic class). We find that any such nonintersectional policy can almost never achieve a representative outcome. In fact, nonintersectional policies often increase the underrepresentation of underrepresented groups in a manner undetected by standard measures. Examples based on race and gender reveal significant hidden inequality arising from nonintersectional policies. We show how to construct intersectional policies that achieve proportional representation. This paper was accepted by Dorothea Kübler, behavioral economics and decision analysis. Funding: This work was supported by the Austrian Science Fund [FG 6-G, I 3487] and the Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-19-CE48-0018-01, ANR-19-P3IA-0003, and ANR-23-PEIA-0003].

Management ScienceVol. 71(5)
Durham University (GB), University of Oxford (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
2.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.