If you are for market creation, you should be for market destruction! Ethics and the relations between exnovation and innovation for changing direction

While innovation and market creation have long received attention for changing the direction of socio-economic development, exnovation and market destruction have received such attention only recently. Rather than assuming innovation and exnovation to be simply two sides of creative destruction processes, we aim to balance the discussion by exploring normative arguments in relation to both innovation and exnovation. We show how instrumental and enabling arguments for changing direction also apply to exnovation. By distinguishing three scenarios–complementation, reversion and reduction–we show that these arguments support genuine creative destruction in the case of a complementary innovation-exnovation relation. In addition, we show that they support an independent focus on exnovation, where the latter relies on reversion to old technologies or on overall reduction of economic activity. We discuss the role of freedom across exnovation processes, and the implication of our analysis for directing societal change without reducing democratic possibilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Responsible Innovation
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2024.2392305
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

If you are for market creation, you should be for market destruction! Ethics and the relations between exnovation and innovation for changing direction

Lukas Fuchs, Rafael Ziegler
8 citations
Journal of Responsible Innovation
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
2.26
article

If you are for market creation, you should be for market destruction! Ethics and the relations between exnovation and innovation for changing direction

Lukas Fuchs, Rafael Ziegler
article en
8 citations

Abstract

While innovation and market creation have long received attention for changing the direction of socio-economic development, exnovation and market destruction have received such attention only recently. Rather than assuming innovation and exnovation to be simply two sides of creative destruction processes, we aim to balance the discussion by exploring normative arguments in relation to both innovation and exnovation. We show how instrumental and enabling arguments for changing direction also apply to exnovation. By distinguishing three scenarios–complementation, reversion and reduction–we show that these arguments support genuine creative destruction in the case of a complementary innovation-exnovation relation. In addition, we show that they support an independent focus on exnovation, where the latter relies on reversion to old technologies or on overall reduction of economic activity. We discuss the role of freedom across exnovation processes, and the implication of our analysis for directing societal change without reducing democratic possibilities.

Journal of Responsible InnovationVol. 11(1)
HEC Montréal (CA), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.