Climate covariate selection influences MaxEnt model predictions and predictive accuracy under current and future climates

The performance and transferability of species distribution models (SDMs) depends on a number of ecological, biological, and methodological factors. There is a growing body of literature that explores how the choice of climate covariate combinations and model parameters can affect predictive performance, but relatively few that delve into covariate reduction methods and the optimisation of model parameters, and the resulting spatial and temporal transferability of those models. The present work used the citrus pest, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), to illustrate how MaxEnt models trained on the insect’s native range in Asia varied in their predictions of climatic suitability across the introduced range when eight different covariate reduction methods were applied during model building. Additionally, it showed how model sensitivity varied across these different covariate combinations using three sets of independently validated occurrence points in the invaded range of the psyllid. Climatically suitable areas for D. citri differed by as much as two-fold between the best and worst-performing models in selected areas. Great care should be taken in the selection of the highest-performing predictor combinations and model parameter settings for SDMs, particularly in the case of invasive species where the assumption of environmental equilibrium is likely violated in the introduced range. Understanding how the predictive ability of SDMs can be influenced by the methodological choices made during the model building phase is vital to ensuring that ecological and invasion management programmes do not over- or underestimate climatic suitability and subsequent invasion risk. • Climatic suitability and model sensitivity varied across covariate combinations. • Up to a two-fold underestimate of suitable climate reported in worse performing models. • Low model transferability found in the African invaded range of Diaphorina citri . • Tuned and default MaxEnt model parameters were not significantly different. • Pest monitoring and management could be affected by model accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Modelling
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110872
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Climate covariate selection influences MaxEnt model predictions and predictive accuracy under current and future climates

Clarke J. M. van Steenderen, Guy F. Sutton
12 citations
Ecological Modelling
Species Distribution and Climate Change
11.03
article

Climate covariate selection influences MaxEnt model predictions and predictive accuracy under current and future climates

Clarke J. M. van Steenderen, Guy F. Sutton
article en
12 citations

Abstract

The performance and transferability of species distribution models (SDMs) depends on a number of ecological, biological, and methodological factors. There is a growing body of literature that explores how the choice of climate covariate combinations and model parameters can affect predictive performance, but relatively few that delve into covariate reduction methods and the optimisation of model parameters, and the resulting spatial and temporal transferability of those models. The present work used the citrus pest, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), to illustrate how MaxEnt models trained on the insect’s native range in Asia varied in their predictions of climatic suitability across the introduced range when eight different covariate reduction methods were applied during model building. Additionally, it showed how model sensitivity varied across these different covariate combinations using three sets of independently validated occurrence points in the invaded range of the psyllid. Climatically suitable areas for D. citri differed by as much as two-fold between the best and worst-performing models in selected areas. Great care should be taken in the selection of the highest-performing predictor combinations and model parameter settings for SDMs, particularly in the case of invasive species where the assumption of environmental equilibrium is likely violated in the introduced range. Understanding how the predictive ability of SDMs can be influenced by the methodological choices made during the model building phase is vital to ensuring that ecological and invasion management programmes do not over- or underestimate climatic suitability and subsequent invasion risk. • Climatic suitability and model sensitivity varied across covariate combinations. • Up to a two-fold underestimate of suitable climate reported in worse performing models. • Low model transferability found in the African invaded range of Diaphorina citri . • Tuned and default MaxEnt model parameters were not significantly different. • Pest monitoring and management could be affected by model accuracy.

Ecological ModellingVol. 498
Rhodes University (ZA)
National Research Foundation, Rhodes University, Citrus Research International, Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
11.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.