MedConceptsQA: Open source medical concepts QA benchmark

Our benchmark serves as a valuable resource for evaluating the abilities of Large Language Models to interpret medical codes and distinguish between medical concepts. We demonstrate that most of the current state-of-the-art clinical Large Language Models achieve random guess performance, whereas GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Llama3-70B outperform these clinical models, despite their primary focus during pre-training not being on the medical domain. Our benchmark is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/ofir408/MedConceptsQA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109089
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MedConceptsQA: Open source medical concepts QA benchmark

Nadav Rappoport, Ofir Ben Shoham
10 citations
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
2.34
article

MedConceptsQA: Open source medical concepts QA benchmark

Nadav Rappoport, Ofir Ben Shoham
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Our benchmark serves as a valuable resource for evaluating the abilities of Large Language Models to interpret medical codes and distinguish between medical concepts. We demonstrate that most of the current state-of-the-art clinical Large Language Models achieve random guess performance, whereas GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Llama3-70B outperform these clinical models, despite their primary focus during pre-training not being on the medical domain. Our benchmark is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/ofir408/MedConceptsQA.

Computers in Biology and MedicineVol. 182
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
2.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.