Safevîler Dönemi İmamiyye Şîasındaki Tasavvuf Eleştirilerinin Tematik Bir Analizi

This study provides a thematic analysis of some of the criticisms of Sufism within the Iranian-Shi'i tradition since the Safavid period. These criticisms primarily focus on the origin of Sufism and argue that Sufism is alien to Shi'i thought. In addition, “waḥdat al-wujūd” (unity of existence), some Sufi practices that are claimed to be “bid‘ah” (unorthodox innovations), and the method of “kashf” (unveiling), which is the method of obtaining knowledge in Sufism, are among the subjects of criticism. Furthermore, the Sufi concepts of “ittiḥād” (union), “ḥulūl” (incarnation), “fanā” (annihilation), and “tajallī” (theophany) are criticized on the basis of the assumption that God and human beings belong to fundamentally different ontological categories. Finally, Sufism is also subjected to criticism regarding “karāmāt” (miracles) which lack rational certainty. This study also aims at times to question the validity of the criticisms based on various arguments and to address the issues objectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33415/daad.1478659
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safevîler Dönemi İmamiyye Şîasındaki Tasavvuf Eleştirilerinin Tematik Bir Analizi

Tahir Uluç, Sinan Yılmaz
Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi
Islamic Studies and History
article

Safevîler Dönemi İmamiyye Şîasındaki Tasavvuf Eleştirilerinin Tematik Bir Analizi

Tahir Uluç, Sinan Yılmaz
article en

Abstract

This study provides a thematic analysis of some of the criticisms of Sufism within the Iranian-Shi'i tradition since the Safavid period. These criticisms primarily focus on the origin of Sufism and argue that Sufism is alien to Shi'i thought. In addition, “waḥdat al-wujūd” (unity of existence), some Sufi practices that are claimed to be “bid‘ah” (unorthodox innovations), and the method of “kashf” (unveiling), which is the method of obtaining knowledge in Sufism, are among the subjects of criticism. Furthermore, the Sufi concepts of “ittiḥād” (union), “ḥulūl” (incarnation), “fanā” (annihilation), and “tajallī” (theophany) are criticized on the basis of the assumption that God and human beings belong to fundamentally different ontological categories. Finally, Sufism is also subjected to criticism regarding “karāmāt” (miracles) which lack rational certainty. This study also aims at times to question the validity of the criticisms based on various arguments and to address the issues objectively.

Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi
Necmettin Erbakan University (TR), Mustafa Kemal University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Islamic Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Safevîler Dönemi İmamiyye Şîasındaki Tasavvuf Eleştirilerinin Tematik Bir Analizi — Tahir Uluç, Sinan Yılmaz · Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS