Globalization of wild capture and farmed aquatic foods

Aquatic foods are highly traded, with nearly 60 million tonnes exported in 2020, representing 11% of global agriculture trade by value. Despite the vast scale, basic characteristics of aquatic food trade, including species, origin, and farmed vs wild sourcing, are largely unknown due to the reporting of trade data. Consequently, we have a coarse picture of aquatic food trade and consumption patterns. Here, we present results from a database on species trade that aligns production, conversion factors, and trade to compute apparent consumption for all farmed and wild aquatic foods from 1996 to 2020. Over this period, aquatic foods became increasingly globalized, with the share of production exported increasing by 40%. Importantly, trends differ across aquatic food sectors. Global consumption also increased by 19.4% despite declining marine capture consumption, and some regions became increasingly reliant on foreign-sourced aquatic foods. To identify sustainable diet opportunities among aquatic foods, our findings, and underlying database enable a greater understanding of the role of trade in rapidly evolving aquatic food systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51965-8
Citations
31
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.23

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Globalization of wild capture and farmed aquatic foods

Kirsty L. Nash, Jessica A. Gephart, Kelvin D. Gorospe, Rahul Agrawal Bejarano et al.
31 citations
Nature Communications
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
14.23
article

Globalization of wild capture and farmed aquatic foods

Kirsty L. Nash, Jessica A. Gephart, Kelvin D. Gorospe, Rahul Agrawal Bejarano, Christopher D. Golden, Michael L. Pace, Rosamond L. Naylor, Alex Godwin, Max Troell
article en
31 citations

Abstract

Aquatic foods are highly traded, with nearly 60 million tonnes exported in 2020, representing 11% of global agriculture trade by value. Despite the vast scale, basic characteristics of aquatic food trade, including species, origin, and farmed vs wild sourcing, are largely unknown due to the reporting of trade data. Consequently, we have a coarse picture of aquatic food trade and consumption patterns. Here, we present results from a database on species trade that aligns production, conversion factors, and trade to compute apparent consumption for all farmed and wild aquatic foods from 1996 to 2020. Over this period, aquatic foods became increasingly globalized, with the share of production exported increasing by 40%. Importantly, trends differ across aquatic food sectors. Global consumption also increased by 19.4% despite declining marine capture consumption, and some regions became increasingly reliant on foreign-sourced aquatic foods. To identify sustainable diet opportunities among aquatic foods, our findings, and underlying database enable a greater understanding of the role of trade in rapidly evolving aquatic food systems.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 15(1)
University of Tasmania (AU), Harvard University (US), Stockholm Resilience Centre (SE), Stockholm University (SE), American University (US), University of Washington (US), University of Michigan (US), Swedish Academy (SE), Centre for Marine Socioecology (AU), University of Virginia (US), Stanford University (US)
National Science Foundation
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
14.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.