Characterization of pea composites and feasibility of heat-modulated meat analogs production

This study aimed to characterize pea composites' functionalities and investigate the feasibility of pea composites-based heat modulated meat analog (MA) production. Pea composites (concentrate, flour) were used as the main source of plant-proteins in preparation of MA. Techno-functional, sensorial, microstructural, chemical, and thermal characteristics of pea composites as well as the prepared MAs were investigated. Results showed that, protein content and particles size significantly (p < 0.05) influenced the water holding capacity (0.94 g/g ± 0.03-1.17 g/g ± 0.08), oil holding capacity (1.08 g/g ± 0.02-1.32 g/g ± 0.04), foaming capacity (49.20 % ± 0.12-58.9 % ± 0.98), foam stability (63.15 % ± 0.21-71.82 % ± 0.68), emulsion stability (61.73 % ± 1.68-66.02 % ± 1.25), least gelation concentration (at pH 7: 8.02 % ± 0.91-18.02 % ± 0.21), and solubility (at pH 7:70.51 % ± 2.54-93.71 % ± 1.86) of studied pea composites; that subsequently influenced the formation of heat-modulated MAs. Color, stickiness, moldability, microstructure (surface plot, fractal dimension: 2.771 ± 0.006-2.884 ± 0.009, surface openings: 8.76 % ± 1.25<sup>-</sup>33.24 % ± 1.28), thermal (denaturization temperature:103.41 °C ± 3.87-161.20 °C ± 1.35, enthalpy: 1085.10 J/g ± 115.42-1322.71 J/g ± 185.65), and chemical attributes of MAs were associated with the protein content (25.30 % ± 0.98-60.30 % ± 1.87) and particle size (d<sub>10</sub>:2.30 μm ± 0.32-15.02 μm ± 1.35; d<sub>50</sub>:6.30 μm ± 1.02-59.01 μm ± 2.35; d<sub>90</sub>:15.11 μm ± 2.34-137.01 μm ± 15.21) of pea composites. MA formulated with pea flour showed better moldability and acceptability in comparison to pea concentrates. This study exposed the use of pea flour as a feasible option to produce heat modulated meat analogs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Chemistry
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.141282
Citations
26
Primary Topic
Meat and Animal Product Quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterization of pea composites and feasibility of heat-modulated meat analogs production

Michael Ngadi, Laura Liu, Anusha Samaranayaka, Md. Hafizur Rahman Bhuiyan
26 citations
Food Chemistry
Meat and Animal Product Quality
8.86
article

Characterization of pea composites and feasibility of heat-modulated meat analogs production

Michael Ngadi, Laura Liu, Anusha Samaranayaka, Md. Hafizur Rahman Bhuiyan
article en
26 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to characterize pea composites' functionalities and investigate the feasibility of pea composites-based heat modulated meat analog (MA) production. Pea composites (concentrate, flour) were used as the main source of plant-proteins in preparation of MA. Techno-functional, sensorial, microstructural, chemical, and thermal characteristics of pea composites as well as the prepared MAs were investigated. Results showed that, protein content and particles size significantly (p < 0.05) influenced the water holding capacity (0.94 g/g ± 0.03-1.17 g/g ± 0.08), oil holding capacity (1.08 g/g ± 0.02-1.32 g/g ± 0.04), foaming capacity (49.20 % ± 0.12-58.9 % ± 0.98), foam stability (63.15 % ± 0.21-71.82 % ± 0.68), emulsion stability (61.73 % ± 1.68-66.02 % ± 1.25), least gelation concentration (at pH 7: 8.02 % ± 0.91-18.02 % ± 0.21), and solubility (at pH 7:70.51 % ± 2.54-93.71 % ± 1.86) of studied pea composites; that subsequently influenced the formation of heat-modulated MAs. Color, stickiness, moldability, microstructure (surface plot, fractal dimension: 2.771 ± 0.006-2.884 ± 0.009, surface openings: 8.76 % ± 1.25<sup>-</sup>33.24 % ± 1.28), thermal (denaturization temperature:103.41 °C ± 3.87-161.20 °C ± 1.35, enthalpy: 1085.10 J/g ± 115.42-1322.71 J/g ± 185.65), and chemical attributes of MAs were associated with the protein content (25.30 % ± 0.98-60.30 % ± 1.87) and particle size (d<sub>10</sub>:2.30 μm ± 0.32-15.02 μm ± 1.35; d<sub>50</sub>:6.30 μm ± 1.02-59.01 μm ± 2.35; d<sub>90</sub>:15.11 μm ± 2.34-137.01 μm ± 15.21) of pea composites. MA formulated with pea flour showed better moldability and acceptability in comparison to pea concentrates. This study exposed the use of pea flour as a feasible option to produce heat modulated meat analogs.

Food ChemistryVol. 463(Pt 2)
Saskatchewan Research Council (Canada) (CA), National Research Council Canada (CA), McGill University (CA)
National Research Council Canada
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Meat and Animal Product Quality
8.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.