Revisiting Wireless Breath and Crowd Inference Attacks With Defensive Deception

Breathing rates and crowd counting can be used to verify the human presence, especially the former one can disclose a person’s physiological status. Many studies have demonstrated success in applying channel state information (CSI) to estimate the breathing rates of stationary individuals and count the number of people in motion. Due to the invisibility of radio signals, the ubiquitous deployment of wireless infrastructures, and the elimination of the line-of-sight (LOS) requirement, such wireless inference techniques can surreptitiously work and violate user privacy. However, little research has been conducted specifically in mitigating misuse of those techniques. This paper proposes new proactive countermeasures against all existing CSI-based vital signs and crowd counting inference methods. Specifically, we set up ambush locations with carefully designed wireless signals, allowing eavesdroppers to infer a false breathing rate or person count specified by the transmitter. The true breathing rate or person count is thus protected. Experimental results on software-defined radio platforms with 5 participants demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed defenses. An eavesdropper can be misled into believing any desired breathing rate with an error of less than 1.2 bpm when the user lies on a bed in a bedroom, and 0.9 bpm when the user sits in a chair in an office room. Additionally, our proposed defense mechanisms can deceive an attacker into believing there are moving individuals in an empty room with a 100% success rate, using both Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Decision Tree (DT) classifiers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tnet.2024.3453903
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting Wireless Breath and Crowd Inference Attacks With Defensive Deception

Edwin Yang, Qiuye He, Shangqing Zhao, Song Fang
3 citations
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
1.05
article

Revisiting Wireless Breath and Crowd Inference Attacks With Defensive Deception

Edwin Yang, Qiuye He, Shangqing Zhao, Song Fang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Breathing rates and crowd counting can be used to verify the human presence, especially the former one can disclose a person’s physiological status. Many studies have demonstrated success in applying channel state information (CSI) to estimate the breathing rates of stationary individuals and count the number of people in motion. Due to the invisibility of radio signals, the ubiquitous deployment of wireless infrastructures, and the elimination of the line-of-sight (LOS) requirement, such wireless inference techniques can surreptitiously work and violate user privacy. However, little research has been conducted specifically in mitigating misuse of those techniques. This paper proposes new proactive countermeasures against all existing CSI-based vital signs and crowd counting inference methods. Specifically, we set up ambush locations with carefully designed wireless signals, allowing eavesdroppers to infer a false breathing rate or person count specified by the transmitter. The true breathing rate or person count is thus protected. Experimental results on software-defined radio platforms with 5 participants demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed defenses. An eavesdropper can be misled into believing any desired breathing rate with an error of less than 1.2 bpm when the user lies on a bed in a bedroom, and 0.9 bpm when the user sits in a chair in an office room. Additionally, our proposed defense mechanisms can deceive an attacker into believing there are moving individuals in an empty room with a 100% success rate, using both Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Decision Tree (DT) classifiers.

IEEE/ACM Transactions on NetworkingVol. 32(6)
University of Missouri–Kansas City (US), University of Oklahoma (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.