Fine-Tuning a Biased Model for Improving Fairness

Fairness has emerged as a crucial concern in machine learning since biased models would generate dissimilar predictions for different groups, perpetuating social inequalities. Although numerous techniques have been proposed to address the fairness issue in machine learning, most rely on incorporating fairness constraints during the training phase, rendering them ineffective once the model is deployed. This paper explores the potential of fine-tuning biased models to enhance fairness, particularly suitable for scenarios where retraining the model is not feasible. Our approach is rooted in an empirical analysis of the distribution of bias within a biased model, and we fine-tune the model parameter in a limited scope so that the performance of the original model can be maintained. We first observe that fine-tuning a biased model leads to deviations from its initial state, with deep layers undergoing the most significant changes. We then design and apply a bias-discovery algorithm, revealing that bias predominantly resides in the model’s deep layers. Based on these observations, we propose a straightforward yet highly effective method for debiasing the model: fine-tuning the classification head. We conduct a thorough theoretical analysis to justify the proposed method and provide guidance for fine-tuning. Furthermore, we experimentally validate our method on tabular and image datasets using four networks (CNN, AlexNet, VGG-11, and ResNet-18).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Big Data
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tbdata.2024.3460537
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fine-Tuning a Biased Model for Improving Fairness

Huiqiang Chen, Philip S. Yu, Tianqing Zhu, Wanlei Zhou et al.
1 citations
IEEE Transactions on Big Data
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
0.53
article

Fine-Tuning a Biased Model for Improving Fairness

Huiqiang Chen, Philip S. Yu, Tianqing Zhu, Wanlei Zhou, Bo Liu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Fairness has emerged as a crucial concern in machine learning since biased models would generate dissimilar predictions for different groups, perpetuating social inequalities. Although numerous techniques have been proposed to address the fairness issue in machine learning, most rely on incorporating fairness constraints during the training phase, rendering them ineffective once the model is deployed. This paper explores the potential of fine-tuning biased models to enhance fairness, particularly suitable for scenarios where retraining the model is not feasible. Our approach is rooted in an empirical analysis of the distribution of bias within a biased model, and we fine-tune the model parameter in a limited scope so that the performance of the original model can be maintained. We first observe that fine-tuning a biased model leads to deviations from its initial state, with deep layers undergoing the most significant changes. We then design and apply a bias-discovery algorithm, revealing that bias predominantly resides in the model’s deep layers. Based on these observations, we propose a straightforward yet highly effective method for debiasing the model: fine-tuning the classification head. We conduct a thorough theoretical analysis to justify the proposed method and provide guidance for fine-tuning. Furthermore, we experimentally validate our method on tabular and image datasets using four networks (CNN, AlexNet, VGG-11, and ResNet-18).

IEEE Transactions on Big DataVol. 11(3)
University of Technology Sydney (AU), University of Illinois Chicago (US), City University of Macau (MO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.