Quantitative Assessment of Muscle Fatigue Based on Improved Gramian Angular Difference Field

Accurately quantifying muscle fatigue and identifying relative risk are crucial for manual laborers and patients with muscle diseases. The existing studies have insufficiently quantified muscle fatigue and have not fully utilized subjective fatigue information. This study proposes a dynamic muscle fatigue recognition method based on the Gaussian normalized Gramian angular difference field (G-GADF) image encoding method, utilizing the multichannel surface electromyography (sEMG) signal fusion method. Thirty-one healthy participants performed a focused bicep curl movement, and the sEMG signals were categorized into ten fatigue states based on the rating of muscle fatigue (RMF) values. The multichannel sEMG signal data are preprocessed and fused into a single-channel signal using the local maxima of different channels at each time. Then, the signals are encoded into 2-D images using the G-GADF method, and these images are fed into the EfficientNet_B0 model. Finally, the EfficientNet_B0 model is compared with other models. The results indicate that the image dataset, generated through preprocessing, multichannel fusion, and G-GADF methods, achieves a test accuracy of 97.058% for ten categorized muscle fatigue classifications using the EfficientNet_B0 model. These methods improve the accuracy of identifying muscle fatigue for individuals engaged in high-intensity physical labor and muscle rehabilitation, aiding in exercise intensity management and muscle injury prevention due to overexertion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Sensors Journal
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/jsen.2024.3456479
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative Assessment of Muscle Fatigue Based on Improved Gramian Angular Difference Field

Dacheng Zhou, Jian Zhou, Lele Peng, Yu Liu
2 citations
IEEE Sensors Journal
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
0.37
article

Quantitative Assessment of Muscle Fatigue Based on Improved Gramian Angular Difference Field

Dacheng Zhou, Jian Zhou, Lele Peng, Yu Liu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Accurately quantifying muscle fatigue and identifying relative risk are crucial for manual laborers and patients with muscle diseases. The existing studies have insufficiently quantified muscle fatigue and have not fully utilized subjective fatigue information. This study proposes a dynamic muscle fatigue recognition method based on the Gaussian normalized Gramian angular difference field (G-GADF) image encoding method, utilizing the multichannel surface electromyography (sEMG) signal fusion method. Thirty-one healthy participants performed a focused bicep curl movement, and the sEMG signals were categorized into ten fatigue states based on the rating of muscle fatigue (RMF) values. The multichannel sEMG signal data are preprocessed and fused into a single-channel signal using the local maxima of different channels at each time. Then, the signals are encoded into 2-D images using the G-GADF method, and these images are fed into the EfficientNet_B0 model. Finally, the EfficientNet_B0 model is compared with other models. The results indicate that the image dataset, generated through preprocessing, multichannel fusion, and G-GADF methods, achieves a test accuracy of 97.058% for ten categorized muscle fatigue classifications using the EfficientNet_B0 model. These methods improve the accuracy of identifying muscle fatigue for individuals engaged in high-intensity physical labor and muscle rehabilitation, aiding in exercise intensity management and muscle injury prevention due to overexertion.

IEEE Sensors JournalVol. 24(20)
Tongji University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
0.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.