A multilevel view of internal technological innovation

This article views organizational innovation as a fundamentally multilevel phenomenon. Project teams conceive of new offerings and work to obtain their final approval. This process unfolds within a structural context shaped by executives in response to environmental dictates. Using Bower’s definition–impetus–context model as a guiding framework, I argue that structures and processes with both functional and dysfunctional consequences arise at various levels. Innovation teams develop well-defined cultures that, if not properly channeled, can produce negative effects on the innovation effort. Similarly, corporate leaders evolve a structural context to facilitate innovation, but risk introducing dislocations into existing patterns of interaction in doing so. Given these challenges, the mediating role of the corporate division takes on importance for organizations seeking to profit from innovative undertakings. Established firms that mobilize their corporate divisions to balance the competing needs of innovating teams and the broader company seem well poised to excel at internal technological innovation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the International Council for Small Business
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/26437015.2024.2392730
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A multilevel view of internal technological innovation

Russell Seidle
Journal of the International Council for Small Business
Innovation and Knowledge Management
article

A multilevel view of internal technological innovation

Russell Seidle
article en

Abstract

This article views organizational innovation as a fundamentally multilevel phenomenon. Project teams conceive of new offerings and work to obtain their final approval. This process unfolds within a structural context shaped by executives in response to environmental dictates. Using Bower’s definition–impetus–context model as a guiding framework, I argue that structures and processes with both functional and dysfunctional consequences arise at various levels. Innovation teams develop well-defined cultures that, if not properly channeled, can produce negative effects on the innovation effort. Similarly, corporate leaders evolve a structural context to facilitate innovation, but risk introducing dislocations into existing patterns of interaction in doing so. Given these challenges, the mediating role of the corporate division takes on importance for organizations seeking to profit from innovative undertakings. Established firms that mobilize their corporate divisions to balance the competing needs of innovating teams and the broader company seem well poised to excel at internal technological innovation.

Journal of the International Council for Small BusinessVol. 6(1)
Suffolk University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.