The relation between perceptual retuning and articulatory restructuring: Individual differences in accommodating a novel phonetic variant

• Language users modify perception and production when accommodating a novel phonetic variant. • This study tested accommodation to novel context-dependent vowel raising. • Individuals’ perception and production were linked in that more adept perceptual adapters were more accurate imitators of the raised vowel. • Perception and production were not tightly linked, though, for aspects of the context-dependent nature of raising. When language users accommodate a novel phonetic variant, they adjust their perceptual and articulatory spaces in listener- and speaker-specific ways. Motivated by the centrality of accommodation and the perception-production relation to theories of phonetics and sound change, this study tests the hypothesis that individuals who are adept at perceptually retuning for a novel variant will be more accurate imitators of that form. In perceptual eye-tracking and spontaneous imitation ultrasound-imaging tasks, 37 American English participants were exposed to a talker’s novel raised /æ/ before /ɡ/ ( bag ), and to their familiar unraised /æk/ ( back ) and /eɪk/ ( bake ). Consistent with the hypothesis, results showed that the more participants showed perceptual facilitation (i.e., used raised /æ(ɡ)/ to disambiguate back-bag trials), the more they imitated raised /æ(ɡ)/. Perceptual retuning, though, did not predict articulatory restructuring: imitators produced not context-dependent raising, but more general “imitative” raising. For theories of sound change, the findings provide circumscribed support for especially adept perceptual adapters to an innovation having the potential to be strong disseminators of that variant. For theories of accommodation, findings point toward the importance of studying imitation of a targeted variant in the broader context of how talkers and imitators situate that variant in relation to phonetically similar forms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Phonetics
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2024.101352
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The relation between perceptual retuning and articulatory restructuring: Individual differences in accommodating a novel phonetic variant

Stephen J Tobin, Ruaridh Purse, Andries W. Coetzee, Patrice Speeter Beddor et al.
Journal of Phonetics
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

The relation between perceptual retuning and articulatory restructuring: Individual differences in accommodating a novel phonetic variant

Stephen J Tobin, Ruaridh Purse, Andries W. Coetzee, Patrice Speeter Beddor, Ian Calloway
article en

Abstract

• Language users modify perception and production when accommodating a novel phonetic variant. • This study tested accommodation to novel context-dependent vowel raising. • Individuals’ perception and production were linked in that more adept perceptual adapters were more accurate imitators of the raised vowel. • Perception and production were not tightly linked, though, for aspects of the context-dependent nature of raising. When language users accommodate a novel phonetic variant, they adjust their perceptual and articulatory spaces in listener- and speaker-specific ways. Motivated by the centrality of accommodation and the perception-production relation to theories of phonetics and sound change, this study tests the hypothesis that individuals who are adept at perceptually retuning for a novel variant will be more accurate imitators of that form. In perceptual eye-tracking and spontaneous imitation ultrasound-imaging tasks, 37 American English participants were exposed to a talker’s novel raised /æ/ before /ɡ/ ( bag ), and to their familiar unraised /æk/ ( back ) and /eɪk/ ( bake ). Consistent with the hypothesis, results showed that the more participants showed perceptual facilitation (i.e., used raised /æ(ɡ)/ to disambiguate back-bag trials), the more they imitated raised /æ(ɡ)/. Perceptual retuning, though, did not predict articulatory restructuring: imitators produced not context-dependent raising, but more general “imitative” raising. For theories of sound change, the findings provide circumscribed support for especially adept perceptual adapters to an innovation having the potential to be strong disseminators of that variant. For theories of accommodation, findings point toward the importance of studying imitation of a targeted variant in the broader context of how talkers and imitators situate that variant in relation to phonetically similar forms.

Journal of PhoneticsVol. 107
University of Potsdam (DE), North-West University (ZA), University of Michigan (US), Alexion Pharma (Switzerland) (CH)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.