Neutronics analysis of a research reactor using a two-step method with the superhomogenization method

• A systematic error analysis is performed for research reactor neutronics calculations based on the two-step method. • Several influential factors, such as the number of energy groups, the homogenization model, and the S N order, are evaluated. • An improved SPH method is proposed based on the eigenvalue iteration scheme. • The SPH method effectively reduces the calculation errors for research reactors. Research reactors are characterized by significant neutron leakage, tight neutron coupling, and complex core geometries, which make accurate neutronics calculations using the two-step method challenging. This paper analyzes and quantifies the errors introduced by the two-step method for research reactor neutronics calculations. Based on the LVR-15 research reactor, the effects of several key factors, such as the number of energy groups, the homogenization model, and the S N order, are studied in detail by comparing the computed k eff and power with reference values. The numerical results indicate that the factors affecting calculation accuracy, in descending order of impact, are the number of energy groups, the homogenization model, and the S N order. The number of energy groups has the most significant impact on calculation accuracy. Specifically, using too few energy groups, such as 2-group energy structures, leads to significant overestimations of k eff . To further improve accuracy, an improved superhomogenization (SPH) method is proposed. It can stably maintain the k eff error below 500 pcm and reduce power prediction errors from 3.08 ∼ 4.67 % and 1.69 ∼ 2.80 % to 1.40 ∼ 3.49 % and 0.60 ∼ 1.98 % in the control-rod-in and control-rod-out cases, respectively. These findings provide valuable reference guidelines for other researchers aiming to achieve more accurate research reactor neutronics calculations based on the two-step method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Nuclear Energy
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2024.110912
Primary Topic
Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neutronics analysis of a research reactor using a two-step method with the superhomogenization method

Tengfei Zhang, Chixu Luo, Chaoyuan Zhang, Mingrui Yang et al.
Annals of Nuclear Energy
Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
article

Neutronics analysis of a research reactor using a two-step method with the superhomogenization method

Tengfei Zhang, Chixu Luo, Chaoyuan Zhang, Mingrui Yang, Xiaojing Liu, Qing Zhu
article en

Abstract

• A systematic error analysis is performed for research reactor neutronics calculations based on the two-step method. • Several influential factors, such as the number of energy groups, the homogenization model, and the S N order, are evaluated. • An improved SPH method is proposed based on the eigenvalue iteration scheme. • The SPH method effectively reduces the calculation errors for research reactors. Research reactors are characterized by significant neutron leakage, tight neutron coupling, and complex core geometries, which make accurate neutronics calculations using the two-step method challenging. This paper analyzes and quantifies the errors introduced by the two-step method for research reactor neutronics calculations. Based on the LVR-15 research reactor, the effects of several key factors, such as the number of energy groups, the homogenization model, and the S N order, are studied in detail by comparing the computed k eff and power with reference values. The numerical results indicate that the factors affecting calculation accuracy, in descending order of impact, are the number of energy groups, the homogenization model, and the S N order. The number of energy groups has the most significant impact on calculation accuracy. Specifically, using too few energy groups, such as 2-group energy structures, leads to significant overestimations of k eff . To further improve accuracy, an improved superhomogenization (SPH) method is proposed. It can stably maintain the k eff error below 500 pcm and reduce power prediction errors from 3.08 ∼ 4.67 % and 1.69 ∼ 2.80 % to 1.40 ∼ 3.49 % and 0.60 ∼ 1.98 % in the control-rod-in and control-rod-out cases, respectively. These findings provide valuable reference guidelines for other researchers aiming to achieve more accurate research reactor neutronics calculations based on the two-step method.

Annals of Nuclear EnergyVol. 211
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.