Results and implications for generative AI in a large introductory biomedical and health informatics course

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) systems have performed well at many biomedical tasks, but few studies have assessed their performance directly compared to students in higher-education courses. We compared student knowledge-assessment scores with prompting of 6 large-language model (LLM) systems as they would be used by typical students in a large online introductory course in biomedical and health informatics that is taken by graduate, continuing education, and medical students. The state-of-the-art LLM systems were prompted to answer multiple-choice questions (MCQs) and final exam questions. We compared the scores for 139 students (30 graduate students, 85 continuing education students, and 24 medical students) to the LLM systems. All of the LLMs scored between the 50<sup>th</sup> and 75<sup>th</sup> percentiles of students for MCQ and final exam questions. The performance of LLMs raises questions about student assessment in higher education, especially in courses that are knowledge-based and online.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Digital Medicine
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01251-0
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Results and implications for generative AI in a large introductory biomedical and health informatics course

William Hersh, Kate Fultz Hollis
10 citations
npj Digital Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.20
article

Results and implications for generative AI in a large introductory biomedical and health informatics course

William Hersh, Kate Fultz Hollis
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) systems have performed well at many biomedical tasks, but few studies have assessed their performance directly compared to students in higher-education courses. We compared student knowledge-assessment scores with prompting of 6 large-language model (LLM) systems as they would be used by typical students in a large online introductory course in biomedical and health informatics that is taken by graduate, continuing education, and medical students. The state-of-the-art LLM systems were prompted to answer multiple-choice questions (MCQs) and final exam questions. We compared the scores for 139 students (30 graduate students, 85 continuing education students, and 24 medical students) to the LLM systems. All of the LLMs scored between the 50<sup>th</sup> and 75<sup>th</sup> percentiles of students for MCQ and final exam questions. The performance of LLMs raises questions about student assessment in higher education, especially in courses that are knowledge-based and online.

npj Digital MedicineVol. 7(1)
Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.