Different strategies of crop diversification between poor and non-poor farmers: Concepts and evidence from Tanzania

Crop diversification, or growing multiple crops in farmland, has received attention as a risk-reducing strategy for smallholders. This study attempts to show that poor and non-poor farmers adopt different strategies of crop diversification. We first conceptualize farmers’ heterogeneous motivations for crop diversification by introducing a subsistence constraint into a utility maximization problem under uncertainty. Using the Tanzanian National Panel Survey, we then examine whether past experiences of shocks affect the adoption of crop diversification differently between poor and non-poor farmers. We rely on a threshold model to estimate heterogeneous impacts between poor and non-poor farmers. We find that poor farmers adopt crop diversification for robust food securities in response to drought/flood and large increases in food prices for purchase. In contrast, non-poor farmers adopt crop diversification to stabilize market income in response to large increases in input prices and large declines in crop prices for sale. • Crop diversification in farmland is a risk-reducing strategy for poverty reduction. • Tanzanian farmers have different motivations for crop diversification, depending on the level of their food consumption. • Poor farmers pursue crop diversification for robust food securities. • Non-poor farmers adopt crop diversification to stabilize market income.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Economics
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108369
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Agricultural risk and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Different strategies of crop diversification between poor and non-poor farmers: Concepts and evidence from Tanzania

Aya Suzuki, Takefumi Fujimoto
10 citations
Ecological Economics
Agricultural risk and resilience
3.34
article

Different strategies of crop diversification between poor and non-poor farmers: Concepts and evidence from Tanzania

Aya Suzuki, Takefumi Fujimoto
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Crop diversification, or growing multiple crops in farmland, has received attention as a risk-reducing strategy for smallholders. This study attempts to show that poor and non-poor farmers adopt different strategies of crop diversification. We first conceptualize farmers’ heterogeneous motivations for crop diversification by introducing a subsistence constraint into a utility maximization problem under uncertainty. Using the Tanzanian National Panel Survey, we then examine whether past experiences of shocks affect the adoption of crop diversification differently between poor and non-poor farmers. We rely on a threshold model to estimate heterogeneous impacts between poor and non-poor farmers. We find that poor farmers adopt crop diversification for robust food securities in response to drought/flood and large increases in food prices for purchase. In contrast, non-poor farmers adopt crop diversification to stabilize market income in response to large increases in input prices and large declines in crop prices for sale. • Crop diversification in farmland is a risk-reducing strategy for poverty reduction. • Tanzanian farmers have different motivations for crop diversification, depending on the level of their food consumption. • Poor farmers pursue crop diversification for robust food securities. • Non-poor farmers adopt crop diversification to stabilize market income.

Ecological EconomicsVol. 227
The University of Tokyo (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Agricultural risk and resilience
3.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.