Multi-fidelity Gaussian process surrogate modeling for regression problems in physics

Abstract One of the main challenges in surrogate modeling is the limited availability of data due to resource constraints associated with computationally expensive simulations. Multi-fidelity methods provide a solution by chaining models in a hierarchy with increasing fidelity, associated with lower error, but increasing cost. In this paper, we compare different multi-fidelity methods employed in constructing Gaussian process surrogates for regression. Non-linear autoregressive methods in the existing literature are primarily confined to two-fidelity models, and we extend these methods to handle more than two levels of fidelity. Additionally, we propose enhancements for an existing method incorporating delay terms by introducing a structured kernel. We demonstrate the performance of these methods across various academic and real-world scenarios. Our findings reveal that multi-fidelity methods generally have a smaller prediction error for the same computational cost as compared to the single-fidelity method, although their effectiveness varies across different scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Machine Learning Science and Technology
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/ad7ad5
Citations
17
Primary Topic
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-fidelity Gaussian process surrogate modeling for regression problems in physics

M. Bergmann, Vladyslav Fediukov, Felix Dietrich, Hans‐Joachim Bungartz et al.
17 citations
Machine Learning Science and Technology
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
5.91
article

Multi-fidelity Gaussian process surrogate modeling for regression problems in physics

M. Bergmann, Vladyslav Fediukov, Felix Dietrich, Hans‐Joachim Bungartz, Tobias Neckel, Fabian Buse, Kislaya Ravi
article en
17 citations

Abstract

Abstract One of the main challenges in surrogate modeling is the limited availability of data due to resource constraints associated with computationally expensive simulations. Multi-fidelity methods provide a solution by chaining models in a hierarchy with increasing fidelity, associated with lower error, but increasing cost. In this paper, we compare different multi-fidelity methods employed in constructing Gaussian process surrogates for regression. Non-linear autoregressive methods in the existing literature are primarily confined to two-fidelity models, and we extend these methods to handle more than two levels of fidelity. Additionally, we propose enhancements for an existing method incorporating delay terms by introducing a structured kernel. We demonstrate the performance of these methods across various academic and real-world scenarios. Our findings reveal that multi-fidelity methods generally have a smaller prediction error for the same computational cost as compared to the single-fidelity method, although their effectiveness varies across different scenarios.

Machine Learning Science and TechnologyVol. 5(4)
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE), Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
5.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Multi-fidelity Gaussian process surrogate modeling for regression problems in physics — M. Bergmann, Vladyslav Fediukov, et al. · Machine Learning Science and Technology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS