Energy expenditure prediction in preschool children: a machine learning approach using accelerometry and external validation

<i>Objective.</i>This study aimed to develop convolutional neural networks (CNNs) models to predict the energy expenditure (EE) of children from raw accelerometer data. Additionally, this study sought to external validation of the CNN models in addition to the linear regression (LM), random forest (RF), and full connected neural network (FcNN) models published in Steenbock<i>et al</i>(2019<i>J. Meas. Phys. Behav.</i><b>2</b>94-102).<i>Approach.</i>Included in this study were 41 German children (3.0-6.99 years) for the training and internal validation who were equipped with GENEActiv, GT3X+, and activPAL accelerometers. The external validation dataset consisted of 39 Canadian children (3.0-5.99 years) that were equipped with OPAL, GT9X, GENEActiv, and GT3X+ accelerometers. EE was recorded simultaneously in both datasets using a portable metabolic unit. The protocols consisted of a semi-structured activities ranging from low to high intensities. The root mean square error (RMSE) values were calculated and used to evaluate model performances.<i>Main results.</i>(1) The CNNs outperformed the LM (13.17%-23.81% lower mean RMSE values), FcNN (8.13%-27.27% lower RMSE values) and the RF models (3.59%-18.84% lower RMSE values) in the internal dataset. (2) In contrast, it was found that when applied to the external Canadian dataset, the CNN models had consistently higher RMSE values compared to the LM, FcNN, and RF.<i>Significance.</i>Although CNNs can enhance EE prediction accuracy, their ability to generalize to new datasets and accelerometer brands/models, is more limited compared to LM, RF, and FcNN models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physiological Measurement
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ad7ad2
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy expenditure prediction in preschool children: a machine learning approach using accelerometry and external validation

Berit Brandes, Hannah J. Coyle-Asbil, Lukas Burk, Marvin N. Wright et al.
3 citations
Physiological Measurement
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
1.63
article

Energy expenditure prediction in preschool children: a machine learning approach using accelerometry and external validation

Berit Brandes, Hannah J. Coyle-Asbil, Lukas Burk, Marvin N. Wright, Lori Ann Vallis, Christoph Buck
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<i>Objective.</i>This study aimed to develop convolutional neural networks (CNNs) models to predict the energy expenditure (EE) of children from raw accelerometer data. Additionally, this study sought to external validation of the CNN models in addition to the linear regression (LM), random forest (RF), and full connected neural network (FcNN) models published in Steenbock<i>et al</i>(2019<i>J. Meas. Phys. Behav.</i><b>2</b>94-102).<i>Approach.</i>Included in this study were 41 German children (3.0-6.99 years) for the training and internal validation who were equipped with GENEActiv, GT3X+, and activPAL accelerometers. The external validation dataset consisted of 39 Canadian children (3.0-5.99 years) that were equipped with OPAL, GT9X, GENEActiv, and GT3X+ accelerometers. EE was recorded simultaneously in both datasets using a portable metabolic unit. The protocols consisted of a semi-structured activities ranging from low to high intensities. The root mean square error (RMSE) values were calculated and used to evaluate model performances.<i>Main results.</i>(1) The CNNs outperformed the LM (13.17%-23.81% lower mean RMSE values), FcNN (8.13%-27.27% lower RMSE values) and the RF models (3.59%-18.84% lower RMSE values) in the internal dataset. (2) In contrast, it was found that when applied to the external Canadian dataset, the CNN models had consistently higher RMSE values compared to the LM, FcNN, and RF.<i>Significance.</i>Although CNNs can enhance EE prediction accuracy, their ability to generalize to new datasets and accelerometer brands/models, is more limited compared to LM, RF, and FcNN models.

Physiological MeasurementVol. 45(9)
University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Bremen (DE), LMU Klinikum (DE), Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS (DE), Munich Center for Machine Learning, University of Guelph (CA), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
University of Guelph, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Mitacs, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
1.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.