Sexism in textbooks: an analysis of gender bias and stereotypes in the english language textbooks of Cavite State University

Considering that gender bias and stereotypes are not only reflected in the behaviors and expectations of parents, teachers, and peers in society, but are also accentuated in language, literature, and fiction, this paper examines the long-standing problem of sexism in English language textbooks used in all educational levels at Cavite State University. The following categories of sexism were examined in this study using the content analysis technique: gender visibility, firstness, occupational-role representations, activities, and character traits. The findings revealed different gendered word counts, with males having a higher quantity. The findings also showed that every frequent category of sexism examined in every textbook is classified as sexist. All categories are dominated by males. Additionally, it was discovered that every textbook that was studied is sexist. The unawareness of writers about sexism and the statistics (such as population, education, employment, and economic relations) of men and women in the Philippines may be the causes of the aforementioned findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diversitas Journal
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48017/dj.v9i3.3117
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gender Studies in Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sexism in textbooks: an analysis of gender bias and stereotypes in the english language textbooks of Cavite State University

Ronlie RJ Espeleta, Cristina M. Signo, Jocelyn B Siochi, Shiela L. Vidallon et al.
1 citations
Diversitas Journal
Gender Studies in Language
0.93
article

Sexism in textbooks: an analysis of gender bias and stereotypes in the english language textbooks of Cavite State University

Ronlie RJ Espeleta, Cristina M. Signo, Jocelyn B Siochi, Shiela L. Vidallon, Still John Reyes, Maria Rizalyn C. Flores
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Considering that gender bias and stereotypes are not only reflected in the behaviors and expectations of parents, teachers, and peers in society, but are also accentuated in language, literature, and fiction, this paper examines the long-standing problem of sexism in English language textbooks used in all educational levels at Cavite State University. The following categories of sexism were examined in this study using the content analysis technique: gender visibility, firstness, occupational-role representations, activities, and character traits. The findings revealed different gendered word counts, with males having a higher quantity. The findings also showed that every frequent category of sexism examined in every textbook is classified as sexist. All categories are dominated by males. Additionally, it was discovered that every textbook that was studied is sexist. The unawareness of writers about sexism and the statistics (such as population, education, employment, and economic relations) of men and women in the Philippines may be the causes of the aforementioned findings.

Diversitas JournalVol. 9(3)
Cavite State University (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Gender Studies in Language
0.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sexism in textbooks: an analysis of gender bias and stereotypes in the english language textbooks of Cavite State University — Ronlie RJ Espeleta, Cristina M. Signo, et al. · Diversitas Journal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS