On the effectiveness of multi-scale landscape metrics in soil organic carbon mapping

• Environmental variables surrounding sample locations play an important role in DSM. • Landscape metrics can comprehensively characterize the surrounding environment. • The intricate relationship between landscape metrics and SOC was fully explored. • Landscape metrics can promote our understanding on the spatial variation of SOC. Soil organic carbon (SOC) mapping delivers invaluable information to the global carbon budget and climate change mitigation endeavour. Environmental variables at sample locations are frequently used as explanatory variables for simulating the spatial distribution of soil properties. However, these may not fully capture the spatial information generated by soil-forming processes. We applied multi-scale landscape metrics that can comprehensively characterize the surrounding landscape information of sample points. The metrics were extracted at two levels (landscape level and class level) and include the diversity, shape and area, fragmentation and connectivity with a buffer distance from 500 m to 5,000 m. We then investigated its effectiveness as environmental variables via recursive feature elimination, random forests, and quantile regression forests. The Jianghan Plain, China, was selected as the study area, where over 19,000 topsoil samples were collected. Results indicated that multi-scale landscape metrics enhanced the predictability of SOC mapping, with R 2 increased by 43 %. Specifically, Shannon’s diversity index, the percentage of landscape index, interspersion and juxtaposition index, and patch cohesion index outperformed environmental variables that were extracted at the sample location. In addition, the relationships between SOC and landscape metrics were found to be scale-dependent. Landscape metrics demonstrated significant explanatory capacity for SOC across various spatial scales. Notably, as the scale surpassed 3,000 m, there was a discernible improvement in the explanatory effectiveness of the landscape metrics for SOC. Our findings highlight that landscape metrics are effective in characterising the soil-landscape relationship that is generated by multi-scale natural and anthropogenic soil-forming processes. Meanwhile, knowledge of the intricate relationship between landscape characteristics and SOC is crucial for informing land management decisions aimed at enhancing carbon sequestration, mitigating climate change, and maintaining soil fertility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoderma
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.117026
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the effectiveness of multi-scale landscape metrics in soil organic carbon mapping

Yiyun Chen, Zheyue Zhang, Yujiao Wei, Zihao Wu et al.
13 citations
Geoderma
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
2.67
article

On the effectiveness of multi-scale landscape metrics in soil organic carbon mapping

Yiyun Chen, Zheyue Zhang, Yujiao Wei, Zihao Wu, Xiaomi Wang, Jiaxue Wang, Jingyi Huang, Zhou Shi
article en
13 citations

Abstract

• Environmental variables surrounding sample locations play an important role in DSM. • Landscape metrics can comprehensively characterize the surrounding environment. • The intricate relationship between landscape metrics and SOC was fully explored. • Landscape metrics can promote our understanding on the spatial variation of SOC. Soil organic carbon (SOC) mapping delivers invaluable information to the global carbon budget and climate change mitigation endeavour. Environmental variables at sample locations are frequently used as explanatory variables for simulating the spatial distribution of soil properties. However, these may not fully capture the spatial information generated by soil-forming processes. We applied multi-scale landscape metrics that can comprehensively characterize the surrounding landscape information of sample points. The metrics were extracted at two levels (landscape level and class level) and include the diversity, shape and area, fragmentation and connectivity with a buffer distance from 500 m to 5,000 m. We then investigated its effectiveness as environmental variables via recursive feature elimination, random forests, and quantile regression forests. The Jianghan Plain, China, was selected as the study area, where over 19,000 topsoil samples were collected. Results indicated that multi-scale landscape metrics enhanced the predictability of SOC mapping, with R 2 increased by 43 %. Specifically, Shannon’s diversity index, the percentage of landscape index, interspersion and juxtaposition index, and patch cohesion index outperformed environmental variables that were extracted at the sample location. In addition, the relationships between SOC and landscape metrics were found to be scale-dependent. Landscape metrics demonstrated significant explanatory capacity for SOC across various spatial scales. Notably, as the scale surpassed 3,000 m, there was a discernible improvement in the explanatory effectiveness of the landscape metrics for SOC. Our findings highlight that landscape metrics are effective in characterising the soil-landscape relationship that is generated by multi-scale natural and anthropogenic soil-forming processes. Meanwhile, knowledge of the intricate relationship between landscape characteristics and SOC is crucial for informing land management decisions aimed at enhancing carbon sequestration, mitigating climate change, and maintaining soil fertility.

GeodermaVol. 449
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Hunan Normal University (CN), Ministry of Natural Resources (CN), China University of Mining and Technology (CN), Changsha Normal University (CN), Wuhan University (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
2.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.