Quantifying the morphology of rock joints and updating the JRC–JCS criterion considering the asperity distribution

Abstract Roughness ubiquitously prevails in rock joints and controls the shear behaviours, permeability and damage characteristics of rock joints. A plethora of investigations have focused on the description of joint roughness; however, a detailed method for quantifying joint roughness and evaluating the shear strength has not yet been established. In this study, within the framework of fractal theory, an optical measurement scale was defined to depict the fractal characteristics of joint roughness, and a boundary measurement scale was used to identify first- and second-order asperities. A composite indicator $$\eta$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>η</mml:mi> </mml:math> , including the fractal roughness coefficient ( $$R_{D}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:mi>D</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:math> ), the coefficient describing the roughness order ( $$\mu$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>μ</mml:mi> </mml:math> ) and the anisotropy parameter ( $$\lambda$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>λ</mml:mi> </mml:math> ), was proposed to quantify the surface morphology, which takes the asperity distribution and roughness anisotropy into account. The relationship between $$\eta$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>η</mml:mi> </mml:math> and JRC was established, and the JRC–JCS criterion was further updated. Moreover, representative examples were given to show the steps required to quantify the morphology of rough joint surfaces with the new quantitative parameter. Direct shear tests were conducted to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method in describing joint roughness and estimating joint shear strength; the results indicate that it is appropriate to use $$\eta$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>η</mml:mi> </mml:math> to estimate the joint roughness and that the proposed shear strength criterion can appropriately predict the shear strength within an acceptable error.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-024-00855-w
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying the morphology of rock joints and updating the JRC–JCS criterion considering the asperity distribution

Zhanguo Xiu, Fanzhen Meng, Feili Wang, Shuhong Wang
9 citations
Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
2.42
article

Quantifying the morphology of rock joints and updating the JRC–JCS criterion considering the asperity distribution

Zhanguo Xiu, Fanzhen Meng, Feili Wang, Shuhong Wang
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Abstract Roughness ubiquitously prevails in rock joints and controls the shear behaviours, permeability and damage characteristics of rock joints. A plethora of investigations have focused on the description of joint roughness; however, a detailed method for quantifying joint roughness and evaluating the shear strength has not yet been established. In this study, within the framework of fractal theory, an optical measurement scale was defined to depict the fractal characteristics of joint roughness, and a boundary measurement scale was used to identify first- and second-order asperities. A composite indicator $$\eta$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>η</mml:mi> </mml:math> , including the fractal roughness coefficient ( $$R_{D}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:mi>D</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:math> ), the coefficient describing the roughness order ( $$\mu$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>μ</mml:mi> </mml:math> ) and the anisotropy parameter ( $$\lambda$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>λ</mml:mi> </mml:math> ), was proposed to quantify the surface morphology, which takes the asperity distribution and roughness anisotropy into account. The relationship between $$\eta$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>η</mml:mi> </mml:math> and JRC was established, and the JRC–JCS criterion was further updated. Moreover, representative examples were given to show the steps required to quantify the morphology of rough joint surfaces with the new quantitative parameter. Direct shear tests were conducted to validate the effectiveness of the proposed method in describing joint roughness and estimating joint shear strength; the results indicate that it is appropriate to use $$\eta$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>η</mml:mi> </mml:math> to estimate the joint roughness and that the proposed shear strength criterion can appropriately predict the shear strength within an acceptable error.

Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-ResourcesVol. 10(1)
Qingdao University of Technology (CN), Northeastern University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
2.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.