Estimating fuel load for wildfire risk assessment at regional scales using earth observation data: A case study in Southwestern Australia

The risk of wildfires is increasing globally and models are critical to reducing this risk. Such models require information on fuel load, a crucial factor of fire behaviour, which is generally determined using a combination of fuel age and fuel accumulation models. Traditionally, estimating fuel load relies on manually compiled fire history data (MCFH). In this paper, we introduce an approach to estimate fuel load using readily available earth observation (EO) data, MODIS MCD64A1. The approach is applied to a wildfire-prone region in Southwestern Australia from 2001 to 2021. Results suggest that MODIS produces more accurate and reliable estimates of fuel load compared with MCFH. It is effective in maintaining spatially and temporally complete records of fires, as it reports 11,019 more hectares of burned areas associated with wildfires over the study period. MODIS performs better in capturing wildfires than prescribed burns, as the spatial overlapping ratio is higher for wildfires (0.63) than prescribed burns (0.42). The high agreement between the two datasets for fuel load estimation (weighted kappa of 0.91) results from grassland covering the majority of the landscape. However, the agreement is reduced for other vegetation types — 0.24 for pine, 0.36 for mallee heath, 0.39 for shrubland, and 0.58 for forest. MODIS has lower effectiveness in detecting small and under-canopy fires such as prescribed burns, suggesting the value in combining EO and manually compiled data to obtain improved estimates of fuel load. Due to the scope of objectives, the integration of EO and MCFH has not been fully explored in this study, which will be included in our future research. This study highlights the potential of earth observation data in assessing wildfire risk as the data are easily accessible and reliable, as well as efficient and cost-effective, and they provide the opportunity to develop mitigation strategies at regional scales.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing Applications Society and Environment
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2024.101356
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating fuel load for wildfire risk assessment at regional scales using earth observation data: A case study in Southwestern Australia

Douglas Radford, Lulu He, Karin Reinke, Holger R. Maier et al.
3 citations
Remote Sensing Applications Society and Environment
Fire effects on ecosystems
0.85
article

Estimating fuel load for wildfire risk assessment at regional scales using earth observation data: A case study in Southwestern Australia

Douglas Radford, Lulu He, Karin Reinke, Holger R. Maier, Hedwig van Delden, Aaron C. Zecchin, Seth Westra, Simon Ramsey, Amelie Jeanneau, Simon Jones, Tim McNaught
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The risk of wildfires is increasing globally and models are critical to reducing this risk. Such models require information on fuel load, a crucial factor of fire behaviour, which is generally determined using a combination of fuel age and fuel accumulation models. Traditionally, estimating fuel load relies on manually compiled fire history data (MCFH). In this paper, we introduce an approach to estimate fuel load using readily available earth observation (EO) data, MODIS MCD64A1. The approach is applied to a wildfire-prone region in Southwestern Australia from 2001 to 2021. Results suggest that MODIS produces more accurate and reliable estimates of fuel load compared with MCFH. It is effective in maintaining spatially and temporally complete records of fires, as it reports 11,019 more hectares of burned areas associated with wildfires over the study period. MODIS performs better in capturing wildfires than prescribed burns, as the spatial overlapping ratio is higher for wildfires (0.63) than prescribed burns (0.42). The high agreement between the two datasets for fuel load estimation (weighted kappa of 0.91) results from grassland covering the majority of the landscape. However, the agreement is reduced for other vegetation types — 0.24 for pine, 0.36 for mallee heath, 0.39 for shrubland, and 0.58 for forest. MODIS has lower effectiveness in detecting small and under-canopy fires such as prescribed burns, suggesting the value in combining EO and manually compiled data to obtain improved estimates of fuel load. Due to the scope of objectives, the integration of EO and MCFH has not been fully explored in this study, which will be included in our future research. This study highlights the potential of earth observation data in assessing wildfire risk as the data are easily accessible and reliable, as well as efficient and cost-effective, and they provide the opportunity to develop mitigation strategies at regional scales.

Remote Sensing Applications Society and EnvironmentVol. 36
Research Institute for Knowledge Systems (NL), RMIT Europe (ES), Services Australia (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
University of Adelaide
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Fire effects on ecosystems
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.