Visualizing Evaluation Theory: Tree, Forest, or Ocean Currents?

Evaluation theories depicted as a five-branch tree reflect the assumptions of the post-positivist, constructivist, pragmatic, transformative, and Indigenous paradigms. A tree is useful because it provides a quick and clear way to show that different assumptions lead to different methodological assumptions. However, evaluation theory as a five-branch tree is limited because it does not show interrelationships between the paradigms. An ocean current visualization could accomplish that task, but it might not be a familiar concept for some populations. Evaluators need to check with stakeholders to ensure the visualizations that are used are viewed as useful to their purposes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation
Published
2024-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v20i48.1015
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Visualizing Evaluation Theory: Tree, Forest, or Ocean Currents?

Donna M. Mertens
1 citations
Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
0.49
article

Visualizing Evaluation Theory: Tree, Forest, or Ocean Currents?

Donna M. Mertens
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Evaluation theories depicted as a five-branch tree reflect the assumptions of the post-positivist, constructivist, pragmatic, transformative, and Indigenous paradigms. A tree is useful because it provides a quick and clear way to show that different assumptions lead to different methodological assumptions. However, evaluation theory as a five-branch tree is limited because it does not show interrelationships between the paradigms. An ocean current visualization could accomplish that task, but it might not be a familiar concept for some populations. Evaluators need to check with stakeholders to ensure the visualizations that are used are viewed as useful to their purposes.

Journal of MultiDisciplinary EvaluationVol. 20(48)
Gallaudet University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
0.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.