What’s in a Name: The Fulfillment Metaphor in Biblical Hebrew

Abstract English speakers habitually imagine and describe words as conduits through which ideas are communicated—a cognitive framework known as the “Conduit Metaphor.” Expressions of this metaphor represent words as “full” or “empty” of information or emotions. In Biblical Hebrew, however, when utterances are described as “empty” they are inefficacious, and when they are “filled” they are enacted: a metaphorical model this article describes as the “Fulfillment Metaphor.” This juxtaposition between cognitive metaphorical models reveals a more fundamental difference in how ancient Israelite and Judean authors imagined the phenomenon of speech. This difference was recognized by earlier scholarship, though these analyses were subsequently challenged on methodological grounds. In addition to introducing and describing the function of the “fulfillment metaphor” in Biblical Hebrew, this article argues that Conceptual Metaphor Theory can be used not only to describe metaphorical models within the Hebrew Bible, but also as a critical and comparative philological tool.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vetus Testamentum
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15685330-bja10181
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What’s in a Name: The Fulfillment Metaphor in Biblical Hebrew

Emily Natasha Branton
Vetus Testamentum
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
article

What’s in a Name: The Fulfillment Metaphor in Biblical Hebrew

Emily Natasha Branton
article en

Abstract

Abstract English speakers habitually imagine and describe words as conduits through which ideas are communicated—a cognitive framework known as the “Conduit Metaphor.” Expressions of this metaphor represent words as “full” or “empty” of information or emotions. In Biblical Hebrew, however, when utterances are described as “empty” they are inefficacious, and when they are “filled” they are enacted: a metaphorical model this article describes as the “Fulfillment Metaphor.” This juxtaposition between cognitive metaphorical models reveals a more fundamental difference in how ancient Israelite and Judean authors imagined the phenomenon of speech. This difference was recognized by earlier scholarship, though these analyses were subsequently challenged on methodological grounds. In addition to introducing and describing the function of the “fulfillment metaphor” in Biblical Hebrew, this article argues that Conceptual Metaphor Theory can be used not only to describe metaphorical models within the Hebrew Bible, but also as a critical and comparative philological tool.

Vetus TestamentumVol. 75(4-5)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.