Endoscopic Transcanal Surgery versus Endaural Microscopic Surgery in the Management of Attic Cholesteatomas at a Tertiary Care Center in Multan

Objective: To compare postoperative outcomes in terms of hearing recovery, taste abnormalities and pain, andaudiological results of microscopic surgery and endoscopic surgery for the management of attic cholesteatomas.Study Design: A prospective cohort study design.Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted at the ENT Department, Bakhtawar Amin & NishtarMedical Hospital Multan, Pakistan from June 2021 to December 2022.Methods: A total of 90 patients were included by consecutive sampling, who were consecutively divided into 45patients each in group A, microscopic endaural approach arm, and group B, endoscopic surgical approach arm.The sample size was calculated by Epi Info keeping 50% population proportion, 5% margin of error, and 95% CI.Patients diagnosed with cholesteatoma in epitympanum by otomicroscopic findings and CT and booked forsurgical treatment were included in the study. Patients with extended cholesteatoma, labyrinth fistulae, widemastoid involvement eustachian tube dysfunction, revision surgery, and pregnant women were excluded.Informed consent of the participants was taken. Microscopic and endoscopic surgeries were performed by anexperienced operator. Patients were followed up after 1st, 3rd, and 6th months of surgery.Results: Postoperatively, dizziness occurred in 4 (8.8%) patients in microscopic surgery groups and 3 (6.6%)patients in endoscopic surgery group. Abnormal taste sensation was reported in 16 (35.5%) patients in Group Aand 12 (26.6%) patients in Group B. In terms of post-operative pain, 9 (20%) patients and 6 (13.3%) hadpostoperative pain requiring analgesics (P= 0.3) in respective groups. The graft success rate in group A was93.3% and in group B was 91.1%. The mean healing time in group A was 32.1 days and in group B was 34.7 days(P= 0.5). Postoperatively, 55.5% of patients in the MES group and 51.1% in the endoscopic ear surgery (EES)group had a hearing threshold between 21-30 decibels.Conclusion: Both endoscopic endaural and microscopic approaches have similar outcomes for surgicalmanagement of attic cholesteatomas in terms of hearing improvement, post-operative pain, and healing times.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Life and Science
Published
2024-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37185/lns.1.1.518
Primary Topic
Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Endoscopic Transcanal Surgery versus Endaural Microscopic Surgery in the Management of Attic Cholesteatomas at a Tertiary Care Center in Multan

Sanaullah Bhatti, Muhammad Tauseef Ijaz, Amber Irfan
Life and Science
Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
article

Endoscopic Transcanal Surgery versus Endaural Microscopic Surgery in the Management of Attic Cholesteatomas at a Tertiary Care Center in Multan

Sanaullah Bhatti, Muhammad Tauseef Ijaz, Amber Irfan
article en

Abstract

Objective: To compare postoperative outcomes in terms of hearing recovery, taste abnormalities and pain, andaudiological results of microscopic surgery and endoscopic surgery for the management of attic cholesteatomas.Study Design: A prospective cohort study design.Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted at the ENT Department, Bakhtawar Amin & NishtarMedical Hospital Multan, Pakistan from June 2021 to December 2022.Methods: A total of 90 patients were included by consecutive sampling, who were consecutively divided into 45patients each in group A, microscopic endaural approach arm, and group B, endoscopic surgical approach arm.The sample size was calculated by Epi Info keeping 50% population proportion, 5% margin of error, and 95% CI.Patients diagnosed with cholesteatoma in epitympanum by otomicroscopic findings and CT and booked forsurgical treatment were included in the study. Patients with extended cholesteatoma, labyrinth fistulae, widemastoid involvement eustachian tube dysfunction, revision surgery, and pregnant women were excluded.Informed consent of the participants was taken. Microscopic and endoscopic surgeries were performed by anexperienced operator. Patients were followed up after 1st, 3rd, and 6th months of surgery.Results: Postoperatively, dizziness occurred in 4 (8.8%) patients in microscopic surgery groups and 3 (6.6%)patients in endoscopic surgery group. Abnormal taste sensation was reported in 16 (35.5%) patients in Group Aand 12 (26.6%) patients in Group B. In terms of post-operative pain, 9 (20%) patients and 6 (13.3%) hadpostoperative pain requiring analgesics (P= 0.3) in respective groups. The graft success rate in group A was93.3% and in group B was 91.1%. The mean healing time in group A was 32.1 days and in group B was 34.7 days(P= 0.5). Postoperatively, 55.5% of patients in the MES group and 51.1% in the endoscopic ear surgery (EES)group had a hearing threshold between 21-30 decibels.Conclusion: Both endoscopic endaural and microscopic approaches have similar outcomes for surgicalmanagement of attic cholesteatomas in terms of hearing improvement, post-operative pain, and healing times.

Life and ScienceVol. 5(3)
Nishtar Medical College and Hospital (PK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.