The EUropeanisation of Research Infrastructure Policy

Abstract Political interest in Research Infrastructures on a European scale has been a new phenomenon, marked in the early 2000s with the launch of the Lisbon Strategy and the European Research Area. European Research Infrastructure policy then developed through, first, the strategic incorporation of incumbents through new modes of coordination; second, the European Commission’s emphasis of joint responsibility at the supranational level, claiming its own accountability and mobilizing the subsidiarity principle to its advantage; third, the incentivization of conformity to the European Commission’s policy agenda through generous financial schemes and fourth, the implementation of tailor-made legislation. While this topic speaks to current debates in EU studies, it also amends analyses of Big Science as an empirical puzzle within European politics and integration and launches a scholarly effort to come to terms with the new phenomenon of Research Infrastructures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Minerva
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-024-09544-0
Citations
3
Primary Topic
International Science and Diplomacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The EUropeanisation of Research Infrastructure Policy

Nicolas Rüffin, Katharina Cramer
3 citations
Minerva
International Science and Diplomacy
6.69
article

The EUropeanisation of Research Infrastructure Policy

Nicolas Rüffin, Katharina Cramer
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Political interest in Research Infrastructures on a European scale has been a new phenomenon, marked in the early 2000s with the launch of the Lisbon Strategy and the European Research Area. European Research Infrastructure policy then developed through, first, the strategic incorporation of incumbents through new modes of coordination; second, the European Commission’s emphasis of joint responsibility at the supranational level, claiming its own accountability and mobilizing the subsidiarity principle to its advantage; third, the incentivization of conformity to the European Commission’s policy agenda through generous financial schemes and fourth, the implementation of tailor-made legislation. While this topic speaks to current debates in EU studies, it also amends analyses of Big Science as an empirical puzzle within European politics and integration and launches a scholarly effort to come to terms with the new phenomenon of Research Infrastructures.

MinervaVol. 63(1)
Lund University (SE), Center of Advanced European Studies and Research (DE)
Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
International Science and Diplomacy
6.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.