Customer Intention to Continue to Use of Waiting Application based on E-TAM

Purpose: This study mainly explores the impact of the BFR training method combined with soccer special training on the lower limb explosive power of college soccer special students. It provides practical references for combining domestic BFR training methods and soccer special training. Method: Eighteen football-specific male college students were randomly divided into a control group and an experimental group, with 9 in the control group undergoing football-specific training only and 9 in the experimental group undergoing BFR training combined with football-specific training. Results: After 6 weeks of experimental intervention, there was no significant difference between the 30m sprint, standing long jump and 5-0-5 running test scores of the experimental group and the control group (p>0.5), but the average rate of change of the test scores of the experimental group before and after the experiment was higher than that of the control group, and the effect of intervention on the test scores of the experimental group in the 30m sprint, standing long jump and 5-0-5 running test scores was better than that of the traditional training. Counter Movement Jump (CMJ) intervention effect of the two groups of experimental subjects does not have a significant difference (p>0.5), the experimental group of Counter Movement Jump test scores intervention effect is comparable to the traditional training. The intergroup comparison of left leg thigh circumference measurements between the two groups of subjects was highly significant (p=0.009 < 0.01), and the experimental group had a better intervention effect on thigh circumference than the traditional training. Conclusions: Blood flow restriction training enhances lower limb explosive power in football soccer-specific students, mainly in the 30m sprint, standing long jump, 5-0-5 toss, and thigh circumference. A 6-week blood flow restriction training increase in lower extremity explosive strength was not sufficient to improve jumping ability in collegiate football-specific students. The integration of BFR training method into the daily training of college football students has certain feasibility, and compared with the traditional college football training and football special speed explosive force training for college football students to improve the explosive force of the lower limbs has a more obvious effect.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal & Article Management System
Published
2024-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31927/asec.20.3.6
Primary Topic
Technology and Data Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Customer Intention to Continue to Use of Waiting Application based on E-TAM

June-Hee Yang, Byung Cheon Lee
Journal & Article Management System
Technology and Data Analysis
article

Customer Intention to Continue to Use of Waiting Application based on E-TAM

June-Hee Yang, Byung Cheon Lee
article en

Abstract

Purpose: This study mainly explores the impact of the BFR training method combined with soccer special training on the lower limb explosive power of college soccer special students. It provides practical references for combining domestic BFR training methods and soccer special training. Method: Eighteen football-specific male college students were randomly divided into a control group and an experimental group, with 9 in the control group undergoing football-specific training only and 9 in the experimental group undergoing BFR training combined with football-specific training. Results: After 6 weeks of experimental intervention, there was no significant difference between the 30m sprint, standing long jump and 5-0-5 running test scores of the experimental group and the control group (p>0.5), but the average rate of change of the test scores of the experimental group before and after the experiment was higher than that of the control group, and the effect of intervention on the test scores of the experimental group in the 30m sprint, standing long jump and 5-0-5 running test scores was better than that of the traditional training. Counter Movement Jump (CMJ) intervention effect of the two groups of experimental subjects does not have a significant difference (p>0.5), the experimental group of Counter Movement Jump test scores intervention effect is comparable to the traditional training. The intergroup comparison of left leg thigh circumference measurements between the two groups of subjects was highly significant (p=0.009 < 0.01), and the experimental group had a better intervention effect on thigh circumference than the traditional training. Conclusions: Blood flow restriction training enhances lower limb explosive power in football soccer-specific students, mainly in the 30m sprint, standing long jump, 5-0-5 toss, and thigh circumference. A 6-week blood flow restriction training increase in lower extremity explosive strength was not sufficient to improve jumping ability in collegiate football-specific students. The integration of BFR training method into the daily training of college football students has certain feasibility, and compared with the traditional college football training and football special speed explosive force training for college football students to improve the explosive force of the lower limbs has a more obvious effect.

Journal & Article Management SystemVol. 20(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Technology and Data Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.