Normal Saline Versus Hypertonic Saline for Airway STENT Maintenance

Nebulized 3%S is safe and may be equally or more effective than NS in preventing obstructive mucus plugging in patients who undergo airway stenting. A larger blinded randomized controlled trial is necessary to confirm this finding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/lbr.0000000000000986
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Tracheal and airway disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Normal Saline Versus Hypertonic Saline for Airway STENT Maintenance

Abhinav Agrawal, Udit Chaddha, Bertin D. Salguero, Greta Joy et al.
3 citations
Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology
Tracheal and airway disorders
1.26
article

Normal Saline Versus Hypertonic Saline for Airway STENT Maintenance

Abhinav Agrawal, Udit Chaddha, Bertin D. Salguero, Greta Joy, Christian M. Lo Cascio
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Nebulized 3%S is safe and may be equally or more effective than NS in preventing obstructive mucus plugging in patients who undergo airway stenting. A larger blinded randomized controlled trial is necessary to confirm this finding.

Journal of Bronchology & Interventional PulmonologyVol. 31(4)
Hofstra University (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Tracheal and airway disorders
1.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.