Distinct and additive effects of visual and vibratory feedback for motor rehabilitation: an EEG study in healthy subjects

In the alpha band, we observed bilateral ERD in the visual feedback conditions (IO, IOV). In the beta band, the ERD was bilateral in the IA, IV and IOV but more lateralized in the IV and IOV. After movement, we observed strong ERS in the IO and IOV but not in the IA or IV. Embodiment was stronger in conditions with vibratory feedback (IOV > IV > IA and IO) CONCLUSION: Conditions with visual feedback (IO, IOV) recruit the mirror neurons system (alpha ERD) and provide more accurate feedback of the task than IA and IV, which triggers motor validation pathways (beta rebound analysis). Vibratory feedback enhances the recruitment of the left sensorimotor areas, with a synergistic effect in the IOV (beta ERD analysis), thus maximizing embodiment. Visual and vibratory feedback recruits the sensorimotor cortex during motor imagery in different ways and can be combined to maximize the benefits of both techniques TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04449328 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-024-01453-3
Citations
4
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distinct and additive effects of visual and vibratory feedback for motor rehabilitation: an EEG study in healthy subjects

Giraux Pascal, Bessaguet Hugo, Struber Lucas, Ojardias Etienne et al.
4 citations
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
1.37
article

Distinct and additive effects of visual and vibratory feedback for motor rehabilitation: an EEG study in healthy subjects

Giraux Pascal, Bessaguet Hugo, Struber Lucas, Ojardias Etienne, Adham Ahmed, Rimaud Diana
article en
4 citations

Abstract

In the alpha band, we observed bilateral ERD in the visual feedback conditions (IO, IOV). In the beta band, the ERD was bilateral in the IA, IV and IOV but more lateralized in the IV and IOV. After movement, we observed strong ERS in the IO and IOV but not in the IA or IV. Embodiment was stronger in conditions with vibratory feedback (IOV > IV > IA and IO) CONCLUSION: Conditions with visual feedback (IO, IOV) recruit the mirror neurons system (alpha ERD) and provide more accurate feedback of the task than IA and IV, which triggers motor validation pathways (beta rebound analysis). Vibratory feedback enhances the recruitment of the left sensorimotor areas, with a synergistic effect in the IOV (beta ERD analysis), thus maximizing embodiment. Visual and vibratory feedback recruits the sensorimotor cortex during motor imagery in different ways and can be combined to maximize the benefits of both techniques TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04449328 .

Journal of NeuroEngineering and RehabilitationVol. 21(1)
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Inserm (FR), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), CEA Grenoble (FR), Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon (FR), Clinatec (FR), Laboratoire d'Électronique des Technologies de l'Information (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne (FR), Université Jean Monnet (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
1.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.