Carbon footprint of oral medicines using hybrid life cycle assessment

Healthcare represents 3–8% of a country's carbon footprint, and medicines are estimated to represent 20–55% of healthcare's carbon footprint. Unfortunately, only scarce and partial medicine life cycle assessments (LCAs) are reported due to the limited availability of needed data to perform them. We describe a method to estimate the cradle-to-pharmacy gate LCA of all oral medicines from the French pharmacopeia (n = 12,316 medicines) that includes the entire medicine-related carbon footprint, encompassing active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), excipients and packaging production, transport, medicine manufacturing, and associated corporate emissions using a hybrid LCA/environmentally extended input-output model. The uncertainty surrounding this estimation is modeled using bootstrap. Although the API carbon footprint is correlated with synthesis yield, its number of steps, presence of chiral center(s), and process mass intensity, the API carbon footprint is better predicted by its wholesale cost. Corporate emissions (34.5%), API production (28.5%), and medicine manufacturing (25.5%) are the most impactful contributors to medicine carbon footprints, while medicine packaging (5.3%), transport (3.6%), and excipients (2.7%) are less significant. Variations from one medicine to another are substantial. The mean carbon footprint of a medicine box is 8.47 kgCO2eq/box (median 1.46 kgCO 2 eq, 95% CI 0.34–73.98). Medicines' carbon footprint is correlated with their price but not linearly, as low-cost medicines have significantly higher emission factors of 0.2–0.3 kgCO 2 /€ versus 0.05–0.1 kgCO 2 /€ for high-cost drugs. Orphan and innovative medicines tend to have higher carbon footprints. Medicine carbon footprints are highly variable. This database allows for a better understanding of the carbon footprint associated with medicines, in order to better eco-design care pathways. • Only a limited number of medicine life cycle assessments are available. • We estimate the detailed carbon footprint of 12,316 oral medicines. • Key contributors are corporate emissions, API production, and medicine manufacturing. • Uncertainty surrounding each medicine's carbon footprint is provided. • This database may help to eco-design care pathways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cleaner Production
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143576
Citations
18
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon footprint of oral medicines using hybrid life cycle assessment

Max Piffoux, Antoine Le Tellier, Zoé Taillemite, Sébastien Taillemite et al.
18 citations
Journal of Cleaner Production
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
3.70
article

Carbon footprint of oral medicines using hybrid life cycle assessment

Max Piffoux, Antoine Le Tellier, Zoé Taillemite, Sébastien Taillemite, Coline Ducrot
article en
18 citations

Abstract

Healthcare represents 3–8% of a country's carbon footprint, and medicines are estimated to represent 20–55% of healthcare's carbon footprint. Unfortunately, only scarce and partial medicine life cycle assessments (LCAs) are reported due to the limited availability of needed data to perform them. We describe a method to estimate the cradle-to-pharmacy gate LCA of all oral medicines from the French pharmacopeia (n = 12,316 medicines) that includes the entire medicine-related carbon footprint, encompassing active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), excipients and packaging production, transport, medicine manufacturing, and associated corporate emissions using a hybrid LCA/environmentally extended input-output model. The uncertainty surrounding this estimation is modeled using bootstrap. Although the API carbon footprint is correlated with synthesis yield, its number of steps, presence of chiral center(s), and process mass intensity, the API carbon footprint is better predicted by its wholesale cost. Corporate emissions (34.5%), API production (28.5%), and medicine manufacturing (25.5%) are the most impactful contributors to medicine carbon footprints, while medicine packaging (5.3%), transport (3.6%), and excipients (2.7%) are less significant. Variations from one medicine to another are substantial. The mean carbon footprint of a medicine box is 8.47 kgCO2eq/box (median 1.46 kgCO 2 eq, 95% CI 0.34–73.98). Medicines' carbon footprint is correlated with their price but not linearly, as low-cost medicines have significantly higher emission factors of 0.2–0.3 kgCO 2 /€ versus 0.05–0.1 kgCO 2 /€ for high-cost drugs. Orphan and innovative medicines tend to have higher carbon footprints. Medicine carbon footprints are highly variable. This database allows for a better understanding of the carbon footprint associated with medicines, in order to better eco-design care pathways. • Only a limited number of medicine life cycle assessments are available. • We estimate the detailed carbon footprint of 12,316 oral medicines. • Key contributors are corporate emissions, API production, and medicine manufacturing. • Uncertainty surrounding each medicine's carbon footprint is provided. • This database may help to eco-design care pathways.

Journal of Cleaner ProductionVol. 475
Hospices Civils de Lyon (FR), Centre Léon Bérard (FR), École Centrale d'Électronique (FR)
Zero hunger, Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
3.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.