Unleashing the power of Manta Rays Foraging Optimizer: A novel approach for hyper-parameter optimization in skin cancer classification

• This work proposes a novel hyperparameter optimization strategy using Manta Rays Foraging Optimizer (MRFO) for a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to improve skin cancer classification accuracy. This work proposes a novel hyperparameter optimization strategy using MRFO for CNN in skin cancer classification. • The MRFO-based model achieves state-of-the-art performance on multiple datasets (ISIC: 99.43 % accuracy, 0.0250 loss; PH2: 99.96 % accuracy, 0.0033 loss; HAM10000: 97.70 % accuracy, 0.0626 loss). The MRFO model achieves 99.43% accuracy (0.0250 loss) on ISIC, 99.96% accuracy (0.0033 loss) on PH2, and 97.70% on HAM10000. • It outperforms conventional optimizers like Grey Wolf Optimizer (98.33 % accuracy, 0.17 loss) demonstrating significant improvement in both accuracy and loss reduction. It outperforms traditional optimizers like Grey Wolf Optimizer, achieving 98.33% accuracy and 0.17 loss. Optimizing hyperparameters is crucial for improving the performance of deep learning (DL) models, especially in complex applications like skin cancer classification from dermoscopic images. This study introduces a novel hyperparameter optimization strategy using the Manta Rays Foraging Optimizer (MRFO). A model tailored for skin cancer classification is created by fine-tuning a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) with MRFO, coupled with in-depth image preprocessing. Empirical evaluations on diverse datasets (ISIC, PH2, HAM10000) showcase the significant superiority of the MRFO-based model over conventional optimization algorithms. The model achieves impressive accuracy and loss metrics (ISIC: 99.43 %, 0.0250; PH2: 99.96 %, 0.0033; HAM10000: 97.70 %, 0.0626), outperforming alternative optimization algorithms such as the Grey Wolf Optimizer (98.33 % accuracy, 0.17 loss), Whale Optimization Algorithm (96 % accuracy), Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm (97.2 % accuracy), Densnet121-MRFO (99.26 % accuracy), InceptionV3 with GA (99.9 % accuracy), and African Vulture Optimization Algorithm (92.7 % accuracy). The novel approach demonstrates superior accuracy and loss metrics, underscoring its potential for precise and efficient skin cancer detection. Additionally, narrow confidence intervals and balanced precision-recall confirm the model’s generalizability and effectiveness, paving the way for early and accurate skin cancer detection and potentially improving patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2024.106855
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.24

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unleashing the power of Manta Rays Foraging Optimizer: A novel approach for hyper-parameter optimization in skin cancer classification

Shamsuddeen Adamu, Hitham Alhussian, Said Jadid Abdulkadir, Norshakirah Aziz et al.
15 citations
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
4.24
article

Unleashing the power of Manta Rays Foraging Optimizer: A novel approach for hyper-parameter optimization in skin cancer classification

Shamsuddeen Adamu, Hitham Alhussian, Said Jadid Abdulkadir, Norshakirah Aziz, Aliyu Garba, Mujaheed Abdullahi, Ayed Alwadin
article en
15 citations

Abstract

• This work proposes a novel hyperparameter optimization strategy using Manta Rays Foraging Optimizer (MRFO) for a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to improve skin cancer classification accuracy. This work proposes a novel hyperparameter optimization strategy using MRFO for CNN in skin cancer classification. • The MRFO-based model achieves state-of-the-art performance on multiple datasets (ISIC: 99.43 % accuracy, 0.0250 loss; PH2: 99.96 % accuracy, 0.0033 loss; HAM10000: 97.70 % accuracy, 0.0626 loss). The MRFO model achieves 99.43% accuracy (0.0250 loss) on ISIC, 99.96% accuracy (0.0033 loss) on PH2, and 97.70% on HAM10000. • It outperforms conventional optimizers like Grey Wolf Optimizer (98.33 % accuracy, 0.17 loss) demonstrating significant improvement in both accuracy and loss reduction. It outperforms traditional optimizers like Grey Wolf Optimizer, achieving 98.33% accuracy and 0.17 loss. Optimizing hyperparameters is crucial for improving the performance of deep learning (DL) models, especially in complex applications like skin cancer classification from dermoscopic images. This study introduces a novel hyperparameter optimization strategy using the Manta Rays Foraging Optimizer (MRFO). A model tailored for skin cancer classification is created by fine-tuning a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) with MRFO, coupled with in-depth image preprocessing. Empirical evaluations on diverse datasets (ISIC, PH2, HAM10000) showcase the significant superiority of the MRFO-based model over conventional optimization algorithms. The model achieves impressive accuracy and loss metrics (ISIC: 99.43 %, 0.0250; PH2: 99.96 %, 0.0033; HAM10000: 97.70 %, 0.0626), outperforming alternative optimization algorithms such as the Grey Wolf Optimizer (98.33 % accuracy, 0.17 loss), Whale Optimization Algorithm (96 % accuracy), Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm (97.2 % accuracy), Densnet121-MRFO (99.26 % accuracy), InceptionV3 with GA (99.9 % accuracy), and African Vulture Optimization Algorithm (92.7 % accuracy). The novel approach demonstrates superior accuracy and loss metrics, underscoring its potential for precise and efficient skin cancer detection. Additionally, narrow confidence intervals and balanced precision-recall confirm the model’s generalizability and effectiveness, paving the way for early and accurate skin cancer detection and potentially improving patient outcomes.

Biomedical Signal Processing and ControlVol. 99
Ahmadu Bello University (NG), Universiti Teknologi Petronas (MY), King Saud University (SA)
Ministry of Education – Kingdom of Saudi Arabi, Yayasan UTP
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
4.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.