Should AI models be explainable to clinicians?

In the high-stakes realm of critical care, where daily decisions are crucial and clear communication is paramount, comprehending the rationale behind Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven decisions appears essential. While AI has the potential to improve decision-making, its complexity can hinder comprehension and adherence to its recommendations. "Explainable AI" (XAI) aims to bridge this gap, enhancing confidence among patients and doctors. It also helps to meet regulatory transparency requirements, offers actionable insights, and promotes fairness and safety. Yet, defining explainability and standardising assessments are ongoing challenges and balancing performance and explainability can be needed, even if XAI is a growing field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Care
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-05005-y
Citations
117
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
40.64

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Should AI models be explainable to clinicians?

Zaineb Chelly Dagdia, Karine Zeitouni, G. Abgrall, Andre L. Holder et al.
117 citations
Critical Care
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
40.64
article

Should AI models be explainable to clinicians?

Zaineb Chelly Dagdia, Karine Zeitouni, G. Abgrall, Andre L. Holder, Xavier Monnet
article en
117 citations

Abstract

In the high-stakes realm of critical care, where daily decisions are crucial and clear communication is paramount, comprehending the rationale behind Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven decisions appears essential. While AI has the potential to improve decision-making, its complexity can hinder comprehension and adherence to its recommendations. "Explainable AI" (XAI) aims to bridge this gap, enhancing confidence among patients and doctors. It also helps to meet regulatory transparency requirements, offers actionable insights, and promotes fairness and safety. Yet, defining explainability and standardising assessments are ongoing challenges and balancing performance and explainability can be needed, even if XAI is a growing field.

Critical CareVol. 28(1)
Emory University (US), Inserm (FR), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Hôpital Marie Lannelongue (FR), Hôpital Paris Saint-Joseph (FR), Université Gustave Eiffel (FR), Bicêtre Hospital (FR), Données et algorithmes pour une ville intelligente et durable (FR)
Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale, Société de Réanimation de Langue Française
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
40.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.