Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study of Root and Canal Morphology of Mandibular First and Second Premolars in Nepalese Population
INTRODUCTION Mandibular premolars are challenging to treat endodontically due to their varied root and canal morphology, impacting treatment prognosis. This study aimed to assess the root and canal morphology of mandibular premolars in a Nepali subpopulation using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images MATERIAL AND METHODS A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on 348 untreated mandibular first and second premolars teeth of both right and left side having completely developed roots from 87 CBCT images of patients from September 2021-April 2024. The study assessed the number of roots, root canals, their configurations and the tooth length. RESULTS Significant variations in root morphology were observed in mandibular premolars, with most having one root (91.40% in first premolars, 100% in second premolars) and one canal (50% in first premolars, 70.69% in second premolars). Type I configurations were most common (50% in first premolars, 70.69% in second premolars), followed by Type V (21.26% in first premolars, 13.79% in second premolars). C-shaped canals were more frequent in first premolars (2.3%) than second premolars (1.15%). CONCLUSION This study provides valuable insights into root canal morphology variations of mandibular premolars in Nepalese sub population. The findings can help clinicians better understand importance CBCT's in anatomical variations and improve endodontic diagnosis and treatment planning for better outcomes.
Authors
- Vanita Gautam
- Snigdha Shubham (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3525-8127)
- Vaibhav Rai
- Kriti Shrestha
- Sageer Ahmad
Institutions
- College of Medical Sciences (NP)
- Universal College of Medical Sciences
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Universal College of Medical Sciences
- Published
- 2024-09-12
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3126/jucms.v12i02.69493
- Primary Topic
- Dental Radiography and Imaging
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00