Fit-for-Future: Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic in Primary Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Transports of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Patients

(1) <b>Background:</b> The COVID-19 pandemic presented significant challenges in managing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) being a critical but resource-intensive intervention. (2) <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective study analyzed veno-venous (VV) ECMO therapy in ARDS patients before and during the pandemic at a high-volume ECMO center in Germany. The study used a reduced ECMO team (one medical and one nursing specialist) to optimize patient care with limited resources, aiming to offer insights for future pandemic management. Data from 181 adult patients (age ≥ 18) with severe ARDS were analyzed: 57 pre-pandemic and 124 during the pandemic. (3) <b>Results:</b> Despite increased isolation measures during the pandemic (25% pre-COVID-19 vs. 79% during COVID-19, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), there was no significant change in transportation mode (ground vs. air) or ECMO implantation times at local hospitals. Similarly, time and distance for primary ECMO transport remained unchanged between the two periods. Complication rates related to ECMO circuit placement and prolonged transport were also insignificant across groups. However, ECMO therapy duration (median 12 days pre-COVID-19 vs. 19 days during COVID-19, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and hospital stays (median 3 days pre-COVID-19 vs. 7 days during COVID-19, <i>p</i> < 0.01) were longer during the pandemic. Mortality rates were also higher during the pandemic (49% pre-COVID-19 vs. 65% during COVID-19, <i>p</i> < 0.05). (4) <b>Conclusions:</b> In conclusion, a reduced ECMO team proved to be an effective resource-saving strategy that maintained high-quality care with low complication rates, despite the additional challenges posed by pandemic-related isolation measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13185391
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fit-for-Future: Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic in Primary Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Transports of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Patients

Stefan Ehrentraut, Stefan Muenster, Jens M. Poth, Mathias Schmandt et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
0.18
article

Fit-for-Future: Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic in Primary Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Transports of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Patients

Stefan Ehrentraut, Stefan Muenster, Jens M. Poth, Mathias Schmandt, Christian Putensen, Stefan Kreyer, Jens‐Christian Schewe, Silvia Schumacher
article en
1 citations

Abstract

(1) <b>Background:</b> The COVID-19 pandemic presented significant challenges in managing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) being a critical but resource-intensive intervention. (2) <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective study analyzed veno-venous (VV) ECMO therapy in ARDS patients before and during the pandemic at a high-volume ECMO center in Germany. The study used a reduced ECMO team (one medical and one nursing specialist) to optimize patient care with limited resources, aiming to offer insights for future pandemic management. Data from 181 adult patients (age ≥ 18) with severe ARDS were analyzed: 57 pre-pandemic and 124 during the pandemic. (3) <b>Results:</b> Despite increased isolation measures during the pandemic (25% pre-COVID-19 vs. 79% during COVID-19, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), there was no significant change in transportation mode (ground vs. air) or ECMO implantation times at local hospitals. Similarly, time and distance for primary ECMO transport remained unchanged between the two periods. Complication rates related to ECMO circuit placement and prolonged transport were also insignificant across groups. However, ECMO therapy duration (median 12 days pre-COVID-19 vs. 19 days during COVID-19, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and hospital stays (median 3 days pre-COVID-19 vs. 7 days during COVID-19, <i>p</i> < 0.01) were longer during the pandemic. Mortality rates were also higher during the pandemic (49% pre-COVID-19 vs. 65% during COVID-19, <i>p</i> < 0.05). (4) <b>Conclusions:</b> In conclusion, a reduced ECMO team proved to be an effective resource-saving strategy that maintained high-quality care with low complication rates, despite the additional challenges posed by pandemic-related isolation measures.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(18)
University Hospital Bonn (DE), University of Rostock (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
0.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.