The Time Has Come

In vitro studies indicate that kidney transplantation from gene-edited pigs in which expression of all three of the known glycan xenoantigens has been deleted may be more challenging in nonhuman primates (NHPs) than it will be in human recipients. Furthermore, pig-to-human xenotransplantation offers several other advantages - (i) the patient can communicate with the surgical team; (ii) recipient microbiological monitoring and environment will be clinical-grade; and (iii) sophisticated graft monitoring and imaging techniques, (v) therapeutic interventions, e.g., dialysis, plasmapheresis, and (v) intensive care can be deployed that are not easily available in NHP laboratory models. We suggest, therefore, that progress to develop safe, informative human clinical trials will be accelerated if pilot clinical cases are initiated. The selection of patients for kidney xenotransplantation can include those who are at high risk of dying imminently, e.g., those experiencing increasing vascular access challenges with no realistic alternative therapy available, and those who have been accepted onto the waitlist for an allograft, but who are unlikely ever to receive one. Patients with an increased risk of dying include those with (i) age >60 years, (ii) blood groups O or B, and (iii) diabetic nephropathy. UNOS data indicate that an average of 25 patients on the kidney waitlist in the USA die or are removed from the list every day (i.e., >9,000 each year). Given the improved xenograft survival observed in preclinical studies, we suggest that it is time to plan a small pilot clinical trial for healthy dialysis patients who understand the risks and potential benefits of kidney xenotransplantation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Surgery
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000006529
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Xenotransplantation and immune response
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.59

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Time Has Come

Winfred W. Williams, Tatsuo Kawai, Nahel Elias, Jay A. Fishman et al.
15 citations
Annals of Surgery
Xenotransplantation and immune response
8.59
article

The Time Has Come

Winfred W. Williams, Tatsuo Kawai, Nahel Elias, Jay A. Fishman, David K.C. Cooper, Richard N. Pierson, Leonardo V. Riella, Joren C. Madsen
article en
15 citations

Abstract

In vitro studies indicate that kidney transplantation from gene-edited pigs in which expression of all three of the known glycan xenoantigens has been deleted may be more challenging in nonhuman primates (NHPs) than it will be in human recipients. Furthermore, pig-to-human xenotransplantation offers several other advantages - (i) the patient can communicate with the surgical team; (ii) recipient microbiological monitoring and environment will be clinical-grade; and (iii) sophisticated graft monitoring and imaging techniques, (v) therapeutic interventions, e.g., dialysis, plasmapheresis, and (v) intensive care can be deployed that are not easily available in NHP laboratory models. We suggest, therefore, that progress to develop safe, informative human clinical trials will be accelerated if pilot clinical cases are initiated. The selection of patients for kidney xenotransplantation can include those who are at high risk of dying imminently, e.g., those experiencing increasing vascular access challenges with no realistic alternative therapy available, and those who have been accepted onto the waitlist for an allograft, but who are unlikely ever to receive one. Patients with an increased risk of dying include those with (i) age >60 years, (ii) blood groups O or B, and (iii) diabetic nephropathy. UNOS data indicate that an average of 25 patients on the kidney waitlist in the USA die or are removed from the list every day (i.e., >9,000 each year). Given the improved xenograft survival observed in preclinical studies, we suggest that it is time to plan a small pilot clinical trial for healthy dialysis patients who understand the risks and potential benefits of kidney xenotransplantation.

Annals of SurgeryVol. 281(2)
Harvard University (US), MGH Institute of Health Professions (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Center for Systems Biology (US)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, American Society of Nephrology, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Xenotransplantation and immune response
8.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.