Estimating probability terms for the background presence of glass when considering activity in forensic casework

Coulson et al. [1] proposed methodology for the estimation of the P and S terms used in glass interpretation when assessing the value of the findings given activity level propositions. These terms arise in a model proposed by Evett [2], Evett and Buckleton [3], and are based on survey data. Specifically they proposed a model for estimating P<sub>k</sub>, k = 0, 1, 2, … and S<sub>n</sub>, n = 1, 2, where P<sub>k</sub> is the probability of finding k distinct sources (or groups) of glass on a person of interest (POI), and S<sub>n</sub> is the probability that the kth source consists of n fragments. In this article we make a number of extensions to the work of Coulson et al. [1]. Firstly we derive an estimate of the uncertainty in the parameter of the Coulson et al. model, and show how this may be used-for example, to compute an estimate of how the probabilities may vary or how to compare estimates resulting from different surveys. Secondly, we extend the model by allowing a more sensible modelling of the "excess" zeros (in the case of the P terms) and excess ones (in the case of the S terms). The methodology used to make these extensions relies on purely frequentist theory of estimation in keeping with the original work. A Bayesian approach to estimation will be the subject of future work. Additionally, we demonstrate the use of an R (R Core Team, [4]) package, called fitPS (Curran, [5]) which makes the methodology described in this article easy to implement in practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forensic Science International
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112221
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Safety Warnings and Signage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating probability terms for the background presence of glass when considering activity in forensic casework

Patrick Buzzini, James M. Curran, Tatiana Trejos
1 citations
Forensic Science International
Safety Warnings and Signage
0.64
article

Estimating probability terms for the background presence of glass when considering activity in forensic casework

Patrick Buzzini, James M. Curran, Tatiana Trejos
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Coulson et al. [1] proposed methodology for the estimation of the P and S terms used in glass interpretation when assessing the value of the findings given activity level propositions. These terms arise in a model proposed by Evett [2], Evett and Buckleton [3], and are based on survey data. Specifically they proposed a model for estimating P<sub>k</sub>, k = 0, 1, 2, … and S<sub>n</sub>, n = 1, 2, where P<sub>k</sub> is the probability of finding k distinct sources (or groups) of glass on a person of interest (POI), and S<sub>n</sub> is the probability that the kth source consists of n fragments. In this article we make a number of extensions to the work of Coulson et al. [1]. Firstly we derive an estimate of the uncertainty in the parameter of the Coulson et al. model, and show how this may be used-for example, to compute an estimate of how the probabilities may vary or how to compare estimates resulting from different surveys. Secondly, we extend the model by allowing a more sensible modelling of the "excess" zeros (in the case of the P terms) and excess ones (in the case of the S terms). The methodology used to make these extensions relies on purely frequentist theory of estimation in keeping with the original work. A Bayesian approach to estimation will be the subject of future work. Additionally, we demonstrate the use of an R (R Core Team, [4]) package, called fitPS (Curran, [5]) which makes the methodology described in this article easy to implement in practice.

Forensic Science InternationalVol. 364
West Virginia University (US), University of Auckland (NZ), Sam Houston State University (US), Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Safety Warnings and Signage
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.