“Hospice Care Could Be a Compassionate Choice”: ChatGPT Responses to Questions About Decision Making in Advanced Cancer

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Patients with cancer use the internet to inform medical decision making. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> To examine the content of ChatGPT responses to a hypothetical patient question about decision making in advanced cancer. <b><i>Design:</i></b> We developed a medical advice-seeking vignette in English about a patient with metastatic melanoma. When inputting this vignette, we varied five characteristics (patient age, race, ethnicity, insurance status, and preexisting recommendation of hospice/the opinion of an adult daughter regarding the recommendation). ChatGPT responses (<i>N</i> = 96) were coded for mentions of: hospice care, palliative care, financial implications of treatment, second opinions, clinical trials, discussing the decision with loved ones, and discussing the decision with care providers. We conducted additional analyses to understand how ChatGPT described hospice and referenced the adult daughter. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square analysis. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Responses more frequently mentioned clinical trials for vignettes describing 45-year-old patients compared with 65- and 85-year-old patients. When vignettes mentioned a preexisting recommendation for hospice, responses more frequently mentioned seeking a second opinion and hospice care. ChatGPT's descriptions of hospice focused primarily on its ability to provide comfort and support. When vignettes referenced the daughter's opinion on the hospice recommendation, approximately one third of responses also referenced this, stating the importance of talking to her about treatment preferences and values. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> ChatGPT responses to questions about advanced cancer decision making can be heterogeneous based on demographic and clinical characteristics. Findings underscore the possible impact of this heterogeneity on treatment decision making in patients with cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0256
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Hospice Care Could Be a Compassionate Choice”: ChatGPT Responses to Questions About Decision Making in Advanced Cancer

Patricia A. Parker, Jessica Hahne, Brian Carpenter, Charlotte Malling et al.
2 citations
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
1.09
article

“Hospice Care Could Be a Compassionate Choice”: ChatGPT Responses to Questions About Decision Making in Advanced Cancer

Patricia A. Parker, Jessica Hahne, Brian Carpenter, Charlotte Malling, Emily L. Mroz, Meghan McDarby
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Patients with cancer use the internet to inform medical decision making. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> To examine the content of ChatGPT responses to a hypothetical patient question about decision making in advanced cancer. <b><i>Design:</i></b> We developed a medical advice-seeking vignette in English about a patient with metastatic melanoma. When inputting this vignette, we varied five characteristics (patient age, race, ethnicity, insurance status, and preexisting recommendation of hospice/the opinion of an adult daughter regarding the recommendation). ChatGPT responses (<i>N</i> = 96) were coded for mentions of: hospice care, palliative care, financial implications of treatment, second opinions, clinical trials, discussing the decision with loved ones, and discussing the decision with care providers. We conducted additional analyses to understand how ChatGPT described hospice and referenced the adult daughter. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square analysis. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Responses more frequently mentioned clinical trials for vignettes describing 45-year-old patients compared with 65- and 85-year-old patients. When vignettes mentioned a preexisting recommendation for hospice, responses more frequently mentioned seeking a second opinion and hospice care. ChatGPT's descriptions of hospice focused primarily on its ability to provide comfort and support. When vignettes referenced the daughter's opinion on the hospice recommendation, approximately one third of responses also referenced this, stating the importance of talking to her about treatment preferences and values. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> ChatGPT responses to questions about advanced cancer decision making can be heterogeneous based on demographic and clinical characteristics. Findings underscore the possible impact of this heterogeneity on treatment decision making in patients with cancer.

Journal of Palliative MedicineVol. 27(12)
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Emory University (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Yale University (US)
National Institute on Aging
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
1.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.