Regionalization in global hydrological models and its impact on runoff simulations: a case study using WaterGAP3 (v 1.0.0)

Abstract. Valid simulation results from global hydrological models (GHMs), such as WaterGAP3, are essential for detecting hotspots or studying patterns in climate change impacts. However, the lack of worldwide monitoring data makes it challenging to adapt GHM parameters to enable such valid simulations globally. Therefore, regionalization is necessary to estimate parameters in ungauged basins. This study presents the results of regionalization methods for the first time applied to the GHM WaterGAP3. It aims to provide insights into (1) selecting a suitable regionalization method for a GHM and (2) evaluating its impact on runoff simulation. In this study, four new regionalization methods have been identified as appropriate for WaterGAP3. These methods span the full spectrum of methodologies, i.e., regression-based methods, physical similarity, and spatial proximity, using traditional and machine-learning-based approaches. Moreover, the methods differ in the descriptors used to achieve optimal results, although all utilize climatic and physiographic descriptors. This demonstrates (1) that different methods use descriptor sets with varying efficiency and (2) that combining climatic and physiographic descriptors is optimal for regionalizing worldwide basins. Additionally, our research indicates that regionalization leads to spatially and temporally varying uncertainty in ungauged regions. For example, regionalization highly affects southern South America, leading to high uncertainties in the flood simulation of the Río Deseado. The local impact of regionalization propagates through the water system, also affecting global estimates, as evidenced by a spread of 1500 km3 yr−1 across an ensemble of five regionalization methods in simulated global runoff to the ocean. This discrepancy is even more pronounced when using a regionalization method deemed unsuitable for WaterGAP3, resulting in a spread of 4208 km3 yr−1. This significant increase highlights the importance of carefully choosing regionalization methods. Further research is needed to enhance the predictor selection and the understanding of the robustness of the methods on a global scale.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoscientific model development
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6819-2024
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regionalization in global hydrological models and its impact on runoff simulations: a case study using WaterGAP3 (v 1.0.0)

Nina Kupzig, Jenny Kupzig, Martina Flörke
8 citations
Geoscientific model development
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
1.61
article

Regionalization in global hydrological models and its impact on runoff simulations: a case study using WaterGAP3 (v 1.0.0)

Nina Kupzig, Jenny Kupzig, Martina Flörke
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Valid simulation results from global hydrological models (GHMs), such as WaterGAP3, are essential for detecting hotspots or studying patterns in climate change impacts. However, the lack of worldwide monitoring data makes it challenging to adapt GHM parameters to enable such valid simulations globally. Therefore, regionalization is necessary to estimate parameters in ungauged basins. This study presents the results of regionalization methods for the first time applied to the GHM WaterGAP3. It aims to provide insights into (1) selecting a suitable regionalization method for a GHM and (2) evaluating its impact on runoff simulation. In this study, four new regionalization methods have been identified as appropriate for WaterGAP3. These methods span the full spectrum of methodologies, i.e., regression-based methods, physical similarity, and spatial proximity, using traditional and machine-learning-based approaches. Moreover, the methods differ in the descriptors used to achieve optimal results, although all utilize climatic and physiographic descriptors. This demonstrates (1) that different methods use descriptor sets with varying efficiency and (2) that combining climatic and physiographic descriptors is optimal for regionalizing worldwide basins. Additionally, our research indicates that regionalization leads to spatially and temporally varying uncertainty in ungauged regions. For example, regionalization highly affects southern South America, leading to high uncertainties in the flood simulation of the Río Deseado. The local impact of regionalization propagates through the water system, also affecting global estimates, as evidenced by a spread of 1500 km3 yr−1 across an ensemble of five regionalization methods in simulated global runoff to the ocean. This discrepancy is even more pronounced when using a regionalization method deemed unsuitable for WaterGAP3, resulting in a spread of 4208 km3 yr−1. This significant increase highlights the importance of carefully choosing regionalization methods. Further research is needed to enhance the predictor selection and the understanding of the robustness of the methods on a global scale.

Geoscientific model developmentVol. 17(17)
Norsk Hydro (Germany) (DE), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Grains Research and Development Corporation
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
1.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.