Dynamic Torque Limitation vs Static Torque Limitation for Bone Screws in Pig Bone

Abstract Correctly torquing bone screws is important to achieve good patient outcomes. An automated system has been previously proposed that may allow more objective torquing of bone screws. Here the system is tested vs. a static torque limit in pig bone. 5 screws were first inserted until stripping to calibrate the dynamic and static limits. Then 6 were inserted limited to 80% of the mean stripping torque. Then 7 were inserted using 80% of the dynamic model-predicted stripping torque. The pull-out strength of the dynamic and static insertions were compared and no statistically significant difference was found. Future work should consider at using larger screws and different bone samples, with more repetitions to try and obtain a statistically significant result.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2024-1071
Primary Topic
Bone fractures and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic Torque Limitation vs Static Torque Limitation for Bone Screws in Pig Bone

Mark P. Staiger, Aditya Joshi, Jack Wilkie, J. Richard et al.
Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
Bone fractures and treatments
article

Dynamic Torque Limitation vs Static Torque Limitation for Bone Screws in Pig Bone

Mark P. Staiger, Aditya Joshi, Jack Wilkie, J. Richard, Georg Rauter, Zoe McFarlane, Knut Möller
article en

Abstract

Abstract Correctly torquing bone screws is important to achieve good patient outcomes. An automated system has been previously proposed that may allow more objective torquing of bone screws. Here the system is tested vs. a static torque limit in pig bone. 5 screws were first inserted until stripping to calibrate the dynamic and static limits. Then 6 were inserted limited to 80% of the mean stripping torque. Then 7 were inserted using 80% of the dynamic model-predicted stripping torque. The pull-out strength of the dynamic and static insertions were compared and no statistically significant difference was found. Future work should consider at using larger screws and different bone samples, with more repetitions to try and obtain a statistically significant result.

Current Directions in Biomedical EngineeringVol. 10(2)
University of Basel (CH), University of Canterbury (NZ), Furtwangen University (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, Fogarty International Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Bone fractures and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.