Comparison of Various Variant Prediction Algorithms and Conservation Scores by Machine Learning Approaches

Machine learning methods are widely used for prediction of the pathogenicity and deleteriousness of the different types of single nucleotide variants (SNVs). This study encompasses a preliminary approach towards the application of different types of machine learning algorithms on the dbNSFPv4.7 (database of Nonsynonymous SNPs Functional Predictions) database to compare the various prediction algorithms and conservation scores to determine which one performs the best. This paves the way for selecting the best prediction algorithm or the combination of the better prediction algorithms in annotation of the variants and classifying them as pathogenic or likely pathogenic, benign or likely benign. The different learning approaches were compared based on the metrices like, accuracy, recall, precision and F1 score. Among the different variant prediction algorithms and conservation scores available in the dbNSFP database, BayesDel AF was the best perfoming followed by BayesDel noAF, MetaRNN, MCAP and MutPred. bStatistic, fitCons, fathmm XF, MutationTaster and phastCons17way primate performed the worst among 31 prediction algorithms and 9 conservation scores selected for this study. The best performing features or instances can be prioritized over others while selecting the functional prediction algorithms, which are used to determine the driver mutations or the pathogenic variants from omics datasets.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.27138
Primary Topic
Genomics and Rare Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Various Variant Prediction Algorithms and Conservation Scores by Machine Learning Approaches

Sombuddha Roy Bhowmick -
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Genomics and Rare Diseases
article

Comparison of Various Variant Prediction Algorithms and Conservation Scores by Machine Learning Approaches

Sombuddha Roy Bhowmick -
article en

Abstract

Machine learning methods are widely used for prediction of the pathogenicity and deleteriousness of the different types of single nucleotide variants (SNVs). This study encompasses a preliminary approach towards the application of different types of machine learning algorithms on the dbNSFPv4.7 (database of Nonsynonymous SNPs Functional Predictions) database to compare the various prediction algorithms and conservation scores to determine which one performs the best. This paves the way for selecting the best prediction algorithm or the combination of the better prediction algorithms in annotation of the variants and classifying them as pathogenic or likely pathogenic, benign or likely benign. The different learning approaches were compared based on the metrices like, accuracy, recall, precision and F1 score. Among the different variant prediction algorithms and conservation scores available in the dbNSFP database, BayesDel AF was the best perfoming followed by BayesDel noAF, MetaRNN, MCAP and MutPred. bStatistic, fitCons, fathmm XF, MutationTaster and phastCons17way primate performed the worst among 31 prediction algorithms and 9 conservation scores selected for this study. The best performing features or instances can be prioritized over others while selecting the functional prediction algorithms, which are used to determine the driver mutations or the pathogenic variants from omics datasets.

International Journal For Multidisciplinary ResearchVol. 6(5)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Genomics and Rare Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.