A Comparative Analysis of Cross-Platform Mobile Development Frameworks

Mobile applications have become a necessity in people’s daily lives, and more are being developed at this time. To increase the efficiency in developing mobile apps, cross-platform mobile app development framework is needed. Currently there are various types of mobile app development frameworks with their respective approaches, be it native apps, mobile web apps, widget based, bridging with JavaScript, and others. For beginners, it is particularly important to choose a good and suitable platform to learn. In order to achieve this goal, this article presents a comparative analysis of five popular mobile development frameworks: Corona SDK (Solar2D), Ionic, Flutter, React Native, and Xamarin. The evaluation covers the advantages and disadvantages of each framework, highlighting key aspects such as development language, technology based, performance, community support, cross-platform capabilities, and learning curves. This study serves as a resource for developers to better understand and navigate the complexities of cross-platform. The goal is to provide developers with a clear understanding of the strengths and limitations of each framework to assist in making informed decisions for their mobile development projects. While recognizing the dynamic nature of technology, the analysis underscores the need for ongoing research and adaptation to leverage the most current tools and practices. Future comparison study should broaden the scope to include more diverse application cases and larger sample sizes to build on these initial insights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/isci62787.2024.10667693
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Mobile and Web Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of Cross-Platform Mobile Development Frameworks

Mohamad Yusof Darus, Donglan Zou
7 citations
Mobile and Web Applications
5.45
article

A Comparative Analysis of Cross-Platform Mobile Development Frameworks

Mohamad Yusof Darus, Donglan Zou
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Mobile applications have become a necessity in people’s daily lives, and more are being developed at this time. To increase the efficiency in developing mobile apps, cross-platform mobile app development framework is needed. Currently there are various types of mobile app development frameworks with their respective approaches, be it native apps, mobile web apps, widget based, bridging with JavaScript, and others. For beginners, it is particularly important to choose a good and suitable platform to learn. In order to achieve this goal, this article presents a comparative analysis of five popular mobile development frameworks: Corona SDK (Solar2D), Ionic, Flutter, React Native, and Xamarin. The evaluation covers the advantages and disadvantages of each framework, highlighting key aspects such as development language, technology based, performance, community support, cross-platform capabilities, and learning curves. This study serves as a resource for developers to better understand and navigate the complexities of cross-platform. The goal is to provide developers with a clear understanding of the strengths and limitations of each framework to assist in making informed decisions for their mobile development projects. While recognizing the dynamic nature of technology, the analysis underscores the need for ongoing research and adaptation to leverage the most current tools and practices. Future comparison study should broaden the scope to include more diverse application cases and larger sample sizes to build on these initial insights.

Xinyu University (CN), Universiti Teknologi MARA System (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Mobile and Web Applications
5.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.