Carbon footprint and techno-economic analysis to decarbonize the production of linerboard via fuel switching in the lime kiln and boiler: Development of a marginal abatement cost curve

The US Pulp and Paper (P&P) industry heavily relies on fossil sources, with lime kiln operations posing a significant challenge for achieving zero on-site fossil emissions. This study assesses the greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction potential and costs associated with alternative fuels in lime kiln operations for linerboard production. Various options, including bio-based fuels including pulverized biomass, gasification of biomass, crude tall oil, bio-methanol, and traditional fuels such as fuel oil and petcoke, were analyzed through detailed process simulations and Life Cycle Assessment. Results indicate that per ton of product, 2,789 kg of CO2-eq is emitted, with 69% being biogenic CO2 and 31% fossil CO2-eq. Notably, replacing the natural gas boiler with a biomass boiler reduces Global Warming Potential (GWP) by 41%, while switching lime kiln fuel to biofuels achieves a 5.5% reduction. Combining a biomass boiler with pulverized biomass fuel use in the lime kiln yields a substantial 93.1% reduction in Scope 1 and 2 emissions, at a cost of $76/ton of CO2-eq avoided.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BioResources
Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.19.4.7806-7823
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon footprint and techno-economic analysis to decarbonize the production of linerboard via fuel switching in the lime kiln and boiler: Development of a marginal abatement cost curve

Hasan Jameel, PETER W. HART, Richard A. Venditti, Ashok Ghosh et al.
4 citations
BioResources
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
0.82
article

Carbon footprint and techno-economic analysis to decarbonize the production of linerboard via fuel switching in the lime kiln and boiler: Development of a marginal abatement cost curve

Hasan Jameel, PETER W. HART, Richard A. Venditti, Ashok Ghosh, Rodrigo Buitrago‐Tello
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The US Pulp and Paper (P&P) industry heavily relies on fossil sources, with lime kiln operations posing a significant challenge for achieving zero on-site fossil emissions. This study assesses the greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction potential and costs associated with alternative fuels in lime kiln operations for linerboard production. Various options, including bio-based fuels including pulverized biomass, gasification of biomass, crude tall oil, bio-methanol, and traditional fuels such as fuel oil and petcoke, were analyzed through detailed process simulations and Life Cycle Assessment. Results indicate that per ton of product, 2,789 kg of CO2-eq is emitted, with 69% being biogenic CO2 and 31% fossil CO2-eq. Notably, replacing the natural gas boiler with a biomass boiler reduces Global Warming Potential (GWP) by 41%, while switching lime kiln fuel to biofuels achieves a 5.5% reduction. Combining a biomass boiler with pulverized biomass fuel use in the lime kiln yields a substantial 93.1% reduction in Scope 1 and 2 emissions, at a cost of $76/ton of CO2-eq avoided.

BioResourcesVol. 19(4)
North Carolina State University (US), WestRock (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
0.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.