Oncologic Outcomes of Incidental Versus Biopsy-diagnosed Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer: A Multi-institutional Study

We compared the outcomes of patients with low-grade prostate cancer on active surveillance according to the type of their initial diagnosis. Patients who have low-grade cancer diagnosed on a procedure to relieve urinary symptoms (incidental prostate cancer) are followed less intensively and undergo curative-intended treatment less frequently. We also found that patients with incidental prostate cancer are more likely to have no cancer on their first follow-up biopsy than patients who have low-grade cancer initially diagnosed on a biopsy. These patients have a more favorable prognosis than their biopsy-detected counterparts and should be managed the same way as patients with negative biopsies if they undergo a subsequent biopsy that shows no cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Urology Open Science
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2024.08.004
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.51

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oncologic Outcomes of Incidental Versus Biopsy-diagnosed Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer: A Multi-institutional Study

Leonardo Quarta, Fabrizio Moro, M. Facco, L. Da Pozzo et al.
6 citations
European Urology Open Science
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
2.51
article

Oncologic Outcomes of Incidental Versus Biopsy-diagnosed Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer: A Multi-institutional Study

Leonardo Quarta, Fabrizio Moro, M. Facco, L. Da Pozzo, Giorgio Gandaglia, Andrew Julian Vickers, Giovanni La Croce, Joris G. Heetman, Umberto Capitanio, Emily Vertosick, Andrea Salonia, Peter Ka‐Fung Chiu, Roderick C.N. van den Bergh, Francesco Montorsi, Isabel Heidegger, Riccardo Leni, Jonathan Olivier, Timo Soeterik, Fabio Zattoni, Lorenzo Bianchi, Sigrid Carlsson, Xiaobo Wu, Marco Roscigno, Luca Lampariello, Alberto Briganti, Harm H E van Melick, Giulia Giannini
article en
6 citations

Abstract

We compared the outcomes of patients with low-grade prostate cancer on active surveillance according to the type of their initial diagnosis. Patients who have low-grade cancer diagnosed on a procedure to relieve urinary symptoms (incidental prostate cancer) are followed less intensively and undergo curative-intended treatment less frequently. We also found that patients with incidental prostate cancer are more likely to have no cancer on their first follow-up biopsy than patients who have low-grade cancer initially diagnosed on a biopsy. These patients have a more favorable prognosis than their biopsy-detected counterparts and should be managed the same way as patients with negative biopsies if they undergo a subsequent biopsy that shows no cancer.

European Urology Open ScienceVol. 68
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), University of Padua (IT), Innsbruck Medical University (AT), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Lund University (SE), Université de Lille (FR), Erasmus MC (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), St. Antonius Ziekenhuis (NL), Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII (IT), Azienda USL di Bologna (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Raffaele (IT), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, National Institutes of Health, Sidney Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, National Cancer Institute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
2.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.