Advances and gaps in policy, practice, and research in transition for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities across four countries

Abstract The difficulties faced by youth with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs) and their families as they move into adulthood are widely documented. The aim of the paper is to explore the current situation in terms of transition processes and outcomes in four countries (the US, UK, Australia and Czech Republic) and identify commonalities and differences that help elucidate what might determine different outcomes. Two research methods—expert knowledge and rapid literature review—were combined to identify sources from which information on transition policy, processes, support practices and outcomes was extracted and synthesised. This review identified gaps in the research evidence including inadequate collection and use of data to drive policy and determine effectiveness, limited evidence‐based models or frameworks for successful transition. There was little transition research that included the voices of young people with IDD. More research is necessary to study the practices of highly successful programmes, and to explore the impact of transition programmes and disability support services on a broader range of outcomes, capturing the experiences of young people themselves and identifying factors that determine successful outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12524
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Disability Education and Employment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advances and gaps in policy, practice, and research in transition for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities across four countries

Roger J. Stancliffe, Brian H. Abery, Renáta Tichá, Julie Beadle‐Brown et al.
8 citations
Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities
Disability Education and Employment
4.21
article

Advances and gaps in policy, practice, and research in transition for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities across four countries

Roger J. Stancliffe, Brian H. Abery, Renáta Tichá, Julie Beadle‐Brown, Jan Šiška, Šárka Káňová
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract The difficulties faced by youth with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs) and their families as they move into adulthood are widely documented. The aim of the paper is to explore the current situation in terms of transition processes and outcomes in four countries (the US, UK, Australia and Czech Republic) and identify commonalities and differences that help elucidate what might determine different outcomes. Two research methods—expert knowledge and rapid literature review—were combined to identify sources from which information on transition policy, processes, support practices and outcomes was extracted and synthesised. This review identified gaps in the research evidence including inadequate collection and use of data to drive policy and determine effectiveness, limited evidence‐based models or frameworks for successful transition. There was little transition research that included the voices of young people with IDD. More research is necessary to study the practices of highly successful programmes, and to explore the impact of transition programmes and disability support services on a broader range of outcomes, capturing the experiences of young people themselves and identifying factors that determine successful outcomes.

Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual DisabilitiesVol. 21(3)
University of Minnesota (US), University of Kent (GB), Charles University (CZ), University of West Bohemia in Pilsen (CZ)
Grantová Agentura České Republiky
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Disability Education and Employment
4.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.