Common odds ratio test and interval estimation for stratified bilateral and unilateral data

In clinical research, data are commonly collected bilaterally from paired organs or bodily parts within individual subjects. However, unilateral data arise when constraints or limiting factors impede the collection of complete bilateral data. In this article, we propose three large-sample tests and five confidence interval methods for making inferences on the common treatment effect, measured by the odds ratio, in a stratified design under integrated bilateral and unilateral data. Our simulation results show that the likelihood ratio-based and score-based tests, along with their associated confidence interval methods, demonstrate robust control of type I error and close-to-nominal coverage probabilities. We apply the proposed methods to real-world datasets of acute otitis media and myopic eyes to showcase their validity and applicability in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802241267357
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Common odds ratio test and interval estimation for stratified bilateral and unilateral data

Shuangcheng Hua, Chang‐Xing Ma
2 citations
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
1.42
article

Common odds ratio test and interval estimation for stratified bilateral and unilateral data

Shuangcheng Hua, Chang‐Xing Ma
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In clinical research, data are commonly collected bilaterally from paired organs or bodily parts within individual subjects. However, unilateral data arise when constraints or limiting factors impede the collection of complete bilateral data. In this article, we propose three large-sample tests and five confidence interval methods for making inferences on the common treatment effect, measured by the odds ratio, in a stratified design under integrated bilateral and unilateral data. Our simulation results show that the likelihood ratio-based and score-based tests, along with their associated confidence interval methods, demonstrate robust control of type I error and close-to-nominal coverage probabilities. We apply the proposed methods to real-world datasets of acute otitis media and myopic eyes to showcase their validity and applicability in clinical practice.

Statistical Methods in Medical ResearchVol. 33(9)
University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
1.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.