The analysis of e‐liquids: A study on chemical diversity and metal content using gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry and inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry

This work aimed to determine the chemical composition of 22 e-liquids available on the Slovenian market. Four different gas chromatography (GC) sample introduction techniques; headspace-GC-mass spectrometry (HS-GC-MS), liquid injection-GC-MS (LI-GC-MS), HS-solid-phase microextraction-GC-MS (HS-SPME-GC-MS), and direct-immersion-SPME-GC-MS (DI-SPME-GC-MS) were employed for qualitative analysis. Various experimental parameters were assessed for each GC sample introduction technique to maximize compound identification. Despite e-liquid packaging reporting a maximum of eight compounds, GC-MS identified more compounds in most samples, especially in menthol-flavored (58 identifiable compounds by HS-SPME-GC-MS), followed by nicotine-containing and fruit-flavored samples. HS-SPME-GC-MS identified the highest number of compounds, followed by HS-GC-MS, DI-SPME-GC-MS, and LI-GC-MS. Nicotine quantification in six samples was performed by LI-GC-MS with dilution in methanol. Nicotine concentration in samples ranged from 16.5 ± 0.5 to 18.5 ± 0.4 mg/mL, which was below the declared concentration of 20 mg/mL. Additionally, quantitative analysis of metals in e-liquids was performed by inductively coupled plasma-MS after microwave-assisted wet acid digestion. Iron was the most abundant metal, with its content ranging from 0.024 to 0.354 µg/g. Barium, bismuth, copper, and tin were also determined in several e-liquids.