A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PORT SITE INFILTRATION OF BUPIVACAINE VS CONVENTIONAL ANALGESICS IN CONTROLLING POSTOPERATIVE PAIN FOLLOWING LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERIES

Ÿ Laparoscopic surgery is a widely accepted surgical technique due to its minimally invasive nature, resulting in Ÿ reduced postoperative pain and quicker recovery times compared to open surgeries [1]. Ÿ Despite these advantages, managing postoperative pain effectively remains a critical aspect of patient care, as inadequate pain control can lead to delayed recovery and other complications [2]. Ÿ Conventional systemic analgesics, commonly used for pain management, can have undesirable side effects Ÿ such as nausea, vomiting, and potential risk of dependency [3]. Ÿ Bupivacaine, a long-acting local anesthetic, has gained attention for its effectiveness in controlling pain with potentially fewer systemic effects when used for port site inltration [4]. Ÿ The interest in comparing bupivacaine with conventional analgesics stems from the need to enhance patient comfort and recovery while minimizing side effects [5].

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GLOBAL JOURNAL FOR RESEARCH ANALYSIS
Published
2024-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36106/gjra/8707673
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PORT SITE INFILTRATION OF BUPIVACAINE VS CONVENTIONAL ANALGESICS IN CONTROLLING POSTOPERATIVE PAIN FOLLOWING LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERIES

Shivakumar J Jangamashetty, M Likhith
GLOBAL JOURNAL FOR RESEARCH ANALYSIS
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PORT SITE INFILTRATION OF BUPIVACAINE VS CONVENTIONAL ANALGESICS IN CONTROLLING POSTOPERATIVE PAIN FOLLOWING LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERIES

Shivakumar J Jangamashetty, M Likhith
article en

Abstract

Ÿ Laparoscopic surgery is a widely accepted surgical technique due to its minimally invasive nature, resulting in Ÿ reduced postoperative pain and quicker recovery times compared to open surgeries [1]. Ÿ Despite these advantages, managing postoperative pain effectively remains a critical aspect of patient care, as inadequate pain control can lead to delayed recovery and other complications [2]. Ÿ Conventional systemic analgesics, commonly used for pain management, can have undesirable side effects Ÿ such as nausea, vomiting, and potential risk of dependency [3]. Ÿ Bupivacaine, a long-acting local anesthetic, has gained attention for its effectiveness in controlling pain with potentially fewer systemic effects when used for port site inltration [4]. Ÿ The interest in comparing bupivacaine with conventional analgesics stems from the need to enhance patient comfort and recovery while minimizing side effects [5].

GLOBAL JOURNAL FOR RESEARCH ANALYSIS
Mangalore Institute of Oncology (IN), Post Graduate Medical Institute (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.