Terrorism in Latin America: The Intersection of State and Non-State Violence in Argentina and Peru

Abstract: Within Latin America during the 20th century, the practice of terrorism manifested itself in the form of state and non-state actors alike. The voracity with which both pursued their goals to subjugate the other occasionally created a causality relationship that exacerbated the societal chaos. In Argentina and Peru, their respective governments pursued increasingly harsh and repressive methods to subdue non-state terrorist groups. However, in Argentina, growing authoritarianism and state violence, particularly during the Dirty War, instigated increasingly reactionary non-state terror responses from well-organized groups, such as the Montoneros. By contrast, Peru saw the rise of unremitting revolutionary terrorism by non-state actors such as Shining Path that drove the Fujimori government into acts of state terrorism. These two diametrically opposed models serve to demonstrate the complexities of understanding the causes of terrorism in the region.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Latin Americanist
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/tla.2024.a936908
Primary Topic
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Terrorism in Latin America: The Intersection of State and Non-State Violence in Argentina and Peru

Robert C. Harding
The Latin Americanist
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
article

Terrorism in Latin America: The Intersection of State and Non-State Violence in Argentina and Peru

Robert C. Harding
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Within Latin America during the 20th century, the practice of terrorism manifested itself in the form of state and non-state actors alike. The voracity with which both pursued their goals to subjugate the other occasionally created a causality relationship that exacerbated the societal chaos. In Argentina and Peru, their respective governments pursued increasingly harsh and repressive methods to subdue non-state terrorist groups. However, in Argentina, growing authoritarianism and state violence, particularly during the Dirty War, instigated increasingly reactionary non-state terror responses from well-organized groups, such as the Montoneros. By contrast, Peru saw the rise of unremitting revolutionary terrorism by non-state actors such as Shining Path that drove the Fujimori government into acts of state terrorism. These two diametrically opposed models serve to demonstrate the complexities of understanding the causes of terrorism in the region.

The Latin AmericanistVol. 68(3)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.