Challenges associated with low rectal malignant obstruction stenting: a case report

An ongoing debate exists regarding the feasibility of placing self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) within 5 cm of the anal verge. Traditionally, SEMS have been considered contraindicated for patients with a malignant rectal obstruction within this region due to potential impact on the anorectal ring or anal canal, which can cause incontinence, proctalgia, and tenesmus. However, in the case of a 63-year-old female who presented with distention, abdominal pain, and diminishing stool output, the rectal exam identified a bulky fixed mass. Imaging studies revealed large bowel obstruction and high-grade stricture, with a minuscule residual lumen. Endoscopy identified a bulky mass obscuring the lumen at 5 cm from the anal verge, and biopsy confirmed adenocarcinoma. Despite the traditionally held contraindication, a 2.5 cm × 9.0 cm colonic stent was successfully deployed, leading to brisk colonic decompression. This allowed the patient to promptly undergo chemoradiotherapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Surgical Case Reports
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjad593
Primary Topic
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges associated with low rectal malignant obstruction stenting: a case report

Philip D. Kondylis, Victor Cabrera-Bou, Eddy Lincango-Naranjo, Luis F. Serrano et al.
Journal of Surgical Case Reports
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
article

Challenges associated with low rectal malignant obstruction stenting: a case report

Philip D. Kondylis, Victor Cabrera-Bou, Eddy Lincango-Naranjo, Luis F. Serrano, Nathan Kostick, Noah Sobel, Gabriel Diaz-Pagan, A Cabrera
article en

Abstract

An ongoing debate exists regarding the feasibility of placing self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) within 5 cm of the anal verge. Traditionally, SEMS have been considered contraindicated for patients with a malignant rectal obstruction within this region due to potential impact on the anorectal ring or anal canal, which can cause incontinence, proctalgia, and tenesmus. However, in the case of a 63-year-old female who presented with distention, abdominal pain, and diminishing stool output, the rectal exam identified a bulky fixed mass. Imaging studies revealed large bowel obstruction and high-grade stricture, with a minuscule residual lumen. Endoscopy identified a bulky mass obscuring the lumen at 5 cm from the anal verge, and biopsy confirmed adenocarcinoma. Despite the traditionally held contraindication, a 2.5 cm × 9.0 cm colonic stent was successfully deployed, leading to brisk colonic decompression. This allowed the patient to promptly undergo chemoradiotherapy.

Journal of Surgical Case ReportsVol. 2024(9)
University of Central Florida (US), AdventHealth Kissimmee (US)
HCA Healthcare
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Challenges associated with low rectal malignant obstruction stenting: a case report — Philip D. Kondylis, Victor Cabrera-Bou, et al. · Journal of Surgical Case Reports (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS